The Age of the Oldest Stars in the Local Galactic Disk from<i>Hipparcos</i>Parallaxes of G and K Subgiants
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We review the history of the discovery of field subgiant stars, the role that they played in the development of the early understanding of stellar evolution, and their importance in the age dating of the Galactic disk. We use the cataloged data from the Hipparcos satellite in this latter capacity. Based on Hipparcos parallaxes with relative accuracies of σ π /π≤0.10, the absolute magnitude of the lower envelope of the nearly horizontal subgiant sequence for field stars in the H‐R diagram for B−V colors between 0.85 and 1.05 is measured to be M V = 4.03 ± 0.06. New stellar evolutionary tracks calculated for metal abundances in the range -0.29≤[Fe/H ]≤ +0.37 are fitted to the main‐sequence, subgiant, and giant‐star distributions in the Hipparcos H‐R diagram. Isochrones for [Fe/H ] = +0.37 provide the best fit to the reddest giants between +3≳M V ≳0, as well as to the envelope of the reddest main‐sequence stars at M V ≳5. The red edge of the densest part of the distribution of field giants is, however, most readily matched by isochrones having [Fe/H ] ≈ +0.23. Such high metal abundances are evidently confirmed by the spectroscopically observed high metallicity (between [Fe/H ] = +0.2 and +0.4) of the old thick‐disk Galactic cluster NGC 6791, whose color‐magnitude diagram can be made to fit either of these red boundaries by adopting suitable values for the reddening and distance modulus (from within the observed ranges of uncertainties of these quantities). The age of the field stars in the solar neighborhood is found to be 7.9 ± 0.7 Gyr (or 7.4 ± 0.7 Gyr if the stellar models allow for the effects of diffusive processes) by fitting the theoretical isochrones for [Fe/H ] = +0.37 to the lower envelope of the Hipparcos subgiants. However, this age is a function of metallicity. The models show a dependence of δt = -3.99([Fe/H] - 0.37) at M V ∼ +4 for metallicities between 0.00 and +0.37. The same grid of isochrones yields ages, in turn, of 4.0 ± 0.2, 6.2 ± 0.5, and 7.5 to 10 Gyr (depending on the assumed reddening) for the old Galactic clusters M67, NGC 188, and NGC 6791 using metal abundances, distance moduli, and reddenings adopted in the text. Although the distance (and hence age) of NGC 6791 is somewhat uncertain, the ages of both the Galactic disk in the solar neighborhood and of NGC 6791 are, nevertheless, likely between 3 and 5 Gyr younger than the oldest halo globular clusters, which have ages of ∼13.5 Gyr. The conclusion is the same as that reached earlier by Liu & Chaboyer, who used Hipparcos parallax stars that were mainly near the main‐sequence turnoff rather than at the lower bound of the subgiant luminosity that we determine here. The most significant results are (1) the supermetallicity of the oldest local disk stars and (2) the large age difference between the most metal poor component of the halo and the thick and thin disk in the solar neighborhood, confirming Liu & Chaboyer. These facts are undoubtedly related and pose again the problem of the proper scenario for the timing of events in the formation of the halo and the Galactic disk in the solar neighborhood.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».