MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2174777550

Children's fears, hopes and heroes - modern childhood in Australia

2007· article· en· W2174777550 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joe Tucci, Janise Mitchell, Chris Goddard

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)NationalityPsychologyPolitical scienceHistoryImmigrationLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This report examines the experiences of modern childhood through the results of an online survey undertaken by a national sample of 600 children and young people aged between 10 - 14 years. The following key themes emerged from the study’s findings. Children’s sense of their place in the world is under threat. Children are particularly concerned about the environment. Over a half of the children surveyed are about not having enough water. Just over four in ten (44%) are nervous about the future impact of climate change and 43% of children are about air and water pollution. A substantial proportion are also concerned about the escalating tension in world affairs. Almost a third of children (31%) are that they will have to fight in a war when they get much older. More than a third (36%) are apprehensive about terrorism. A quarter of children are so troubled about the state of the world that they honestly believe it will come to an end before they get older. Children’s sense of their community is under threat. Half of the children (51%) did not feel welcome in shops and cafes. Over a third (36%) believed that adults do not care about what children think. A substantial proportion of them were really about being teased (57%), not fitting in with friends (54%) and being bullied (52%). 1 in 10 of the children surveyed were particularly anxious about being called names because of their culture or nationality. 1 in 13 were about being called names because of their religion. More than a quarter (27%) of children feared being a victim of crime. Increasingly, children are disturbed by the relentless pressure of marketing aimed at them. A large majority (88%) believed that companies tried to sell them things that they do not really need. Children’s sense of themselves is under threat. Overwhelmingly, a substantial proportion of children feel insecure. Nearly half (46%) of the children surveyed do not feel confident about themselves. More than a half (57%) about what others thought about them. 4 in 10 stated that they do not ever feel like they are doing well enough. Almost 1 in 5 (19%) believe they are growing up too fast. A large number (41%) of children are specifically about the way they look with 35% concerned about being overweight and 16% being too skinny. By using a cluster analysis, these overall findings suggested that the population of children who completed the survey could be categorised into children who felt well connected and supported (52%), the worried group (42%) or the and insular (8%) group. This last group, in particular, show signs of enormous vulnerability and are most likely to be set on an early trajectory of hopelessness and despair. The authors conclude that children themselves believe that adults show little concern or respect for their views and opinions. This study is unequivocal in the strength of its conclusion. Children should be consulted about what the world should be like. And adults should listen. The report finally notes that all children, and in particular those who are disconnected and insular, would be better supported if the Australian Government re-established the role of Minister for Children and created a National Children’s Commissioner. Together, these national structures should carry responsibility for developing nationally co-ordinated and properly resourced responses to vulnerable children and young people.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,158
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,315

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,005
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations62
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207