MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2177216071 · doi:10.1580/pr22-05.1

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Tibetan Buddhist Monks

2006· article· en· W2177216071 sur OpenAlexafffund
Michael S. Koehle

Notice bibliographique

RevueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Établissements canadiensMichael Smith Health Research BCUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesMichael Smith Health Research BCWilderness Medical Society
Mots-clésAthletesMedicinePatellofemoral pain syndromePhysical therapyBuddhismPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicineHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a common diagnosis in athletes and especially runners. This article discusses 3 cases of patellofemoral pain caused by pronounced inactivity and prolonged knee hyperflexion at altitude in a unique population of Tibetan Buddhist monks. In this case, the monks responded well to a program of activity modification and exercises. Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a common diagnosis in athletes and especially runners. This article discusses 3 cases of patellofemoral pain caused by pronounced inactivity and prolonged knee hyperflexion at altitude in a unique population of Tibetan Buddhist monks. In this case, the monks responded well to a program of activity modification and exercises. Patellofemoral pain syndrome is an extremely common condition affecting both athletes and nonathletes.1.Witvrouw E. Werner S. Mikkelsen C. Van Tiggelen D. Vanden Berghe L. Cerulli G. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non-operative treatment.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13: 122-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar The pain is typically multifactorial in etiology. From a group of Tibetan Buddhist monks, we report 3 cases related to disuse atrophy, prolonged sitting in a challenging position, and possibly environmental factors. Three young monks presented with anterior knee pain during a home visit by the local volunteer physician. These monks were approximately 6 months into a 3-year term in a remote monastery, or gompa, in the Nepal Himalaya. The 2-storied gompa was located at an elevation of 3600 m, and the monks were unable to leave it during their term. They were not allowed any contact with outsiders (other than the physician). The monks were men of Tibeto-Burman descent aged 20, 21, and 29 years. None of them had a past history of knee pain or knee trauma. They complained of bilateral anterior knee pain of 2 to 3 week's duration. The 21-year-old monk felt the pain much more on the left side. The pain was made worse by sitting in the lotus position, which entails having the legs crossed such that the feet rest on top of the knees, not below the knees as in a standard cross-legged pose (see Figure). The 29-year-old monk had difficulty sleeping at night because of the pain. He found that the pain was worse earlier in the day and in colder weather. All 3 monks had pain with squatting and long periods of sitting in the lotus position. The monks followed a very strict daily schedule. They slept in the lotus position from 2230 hours until 0300 hours. They had 4 chanting sessions per day performed in the lotus position, with each session lasting 2½ to 3 hours. They undertook their own activities of daily living, but instrumental activities of daily living (eg, cooking, errands) were performed by junior monks. The cloistered monks were primarily confined to the second floor of the gompa, very rarely traveling up and down a ladder between the 2 floors. For footwear, they wore plain “thong” sandals. The monks followed a very simple vegetarian diet (main protein sources were dairy and legumes). They had no other significant medical problems. On examination, each monk had relatively neutral lower-limb alignment. The 21-year-old had mild genu valgus. There were no significant abnormalities of foot alignment and gait. There was no asymmetry of muscle bulk, though all 3 monks had poorly developed thigh musculature. Knee examination in all 3 monks demonstrated no abnormalities to inspection. Passive range of motion was full and pain free. There were no effusions. Joint line tenderness was absent. Ligament testing was normal, as was the McMurray test. All 3 monks had retropatellar tenderness and crepitus, and apprehension test and patellar mobility were normal. Hip abductor power was found to be very weak, and Ober tests for iliotibial band tightness were normal. Investigations were impractical because of the remote location of the clinic and the monks’ vows. The monks were asked to sleep and chant with legs crossed instead of in the lotus position. Each monk was prescribed 2 strength exercises: a wall squat and side leg raises (3 sets of 10 repetitions each). They were also prescribed some simple quadriceps stretches and were encouraged to walk around the inside of the gompa as much as possible. A follow-up visit occurred at approximately 4 weeks. All 3 monks felt significantly better. The 2 younger monks were now pain free, and the oldest had very mild discomfort. He was now able to sleep at night. Patellofemoral pain syndrome is multifactorial and has been attributed to muscle dysfunction, malalignment,1.Witvrouw E. Werner S. Mikkelsen C. Van Tiggelen D. Vanden Berghe L. Cerulli G. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non-operative treatment.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13: 122-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar or a combination of both. Malalignment was present in only 1 patient and only to a very mild degree. Muscle dysfunction can be caused by inflexibility, neuromuscular dysfunction, or muscle weakness. Weakness in both the quadriceps2.Owings T.M. Grabiner M.D. Motor control of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis muscles is disrupted during eccentric contractions in subjects with patellofemoral pain.Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 483-487Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar,3.Callaghan M.J. Oldham J.A. Quadriceps atrophy: to what extent does it exist in patellofemoral pain syndrome?.Br J Sports Med. 2004; 38: 295-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (88) Google Scholar and the hip abductors4.Niemuth P.E. Johnson R.J. Myers M.J. Thieman T.J. Hip muscle weakness and overuse injuries in recreational runners.Clin J Sport Med. 2005; 15: 14-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar,5.Ireland M.L. Willson J.D. Ballantyne B.T. Davis I.M. Hip strength in females with and without patellofemoral pain.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003; 33: 671-676Crossref PubMed Scopus (490) Google Scholar has been postulated to contribute to patellofemoral pain syndrome. The monks in this case report demonstrated 2 possible interrelated risk factors for weakness: disuse and chronic hypoxia. When the monks moved to the gompa, they experienced a profound decrease in their activity level, causing muscle weakness through disuse. Inactivity has also been shown to impair knee joint proprioception,6.Petrella R.J. Lattanzio P.J. Nelson M.G. Effect of age and activity on knee joint proprioception.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 76: 235-241Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar another contributor to patellofemoral pain syndrome.7.Baker V. Bennell K. Stillman B. Cowan S. Crossley K. Abnormal knee joint position sense in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.J Orthop Res. 2002; 20: 208-214Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar The monks also began spending up to 16 hours per day in the lotus position. In this position, the knees are flexed between 100 and 115 degrees. This position also causes increased external tibial rotation and varus stress. Such a prolonged posture may have also put extra stress on the patellofemoral joint. There is no literature on the lotus position and knee function, but such a position is likely a modified variant on the “theater” sign, putting more force on the proximal and lateral patellofemoral joints. Switching to a standard cross-legged position would have reduced the external tibial torsion and the contact pressure on the injured area. The altitude of the gompa may have played a role in the monks’ pathogenesis. Muscle loss at altitude has been reported at altitudes above 5000 m8.Tschop M. Morrison K.M. Weight loss at high altitude.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001; 502: 237-247Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar but in more active individuals. These monks resided at 3600 m, but they were also much less active than the climbers who are typically studied at the higher altitudes. The monks’ resting arterial oxygen saturation would have been similar to other residents of the community (approximately 88%). This chronic hypoxia, combined with the profound inactivity, may have accelerated the monks’ disuse atrophy. These individuals had no background in exercise training, so the prescribed exercise protocol was designed to be as simple as possible without using equipment. Their symptomatic improvement was surprisingly rapid and may relate to the brevity of their condition before presentation. These cases represent a unique combination of sudden inactivity, moderate altitude, and prolonged hyperflexion causing patellofemoral pain syndrome, which responded to exercise prescription and activity modification.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,483
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,532

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,158
Écart entre enseignants0,153 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWilderness and Environmental MedicineMême sujetLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesTravaux en français237 207