Effect of Solution Gas in Oil on CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In this study, a rising bubble apparatus (RBA) was used to determine the CO2 MMP for various oils. RBA tests permit direct observation of changes in bubble behaviour and thus offered insight into the phase behaviour for the CO2-reservoir fluid system. The CO2 MMPs were estimated for two Steelman reservoir fluids with a high gas-oil ratio, the partially flashed reservoir fluids, and the dead oils. The composition of solution gas of each partially flashed reservoir fluid was determined and the effects of different gas components were analysed. The MMP was also determined and discussed for Weyburn reservoir fluids which had a low gas-oil ratio with pure and impure CO2. The results of this study demonstrated that the effect of solution gas in oil on CO2 MP could be significant. Furthermore, achieving a miscible CO2 flood (in a reservoir with a Steelman-like reservoir fluid) could be possible at a lower operating pressure than the measured CO2 MMP, by partially depleting the reservoir. This may be the only option for some reservoirs which cannot sustain the relatively high pressure required for achieving miscibility. Introduction Carbon dioxide flooding is a proven oil recovery process(1). Over the last decade, carbon dioxide injection has become the leading enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process for light oils(2). CO2 injection can prolong, by 15 to 20 years, the production life of light oil fields nearing depletion under waterflood, and may recover 15 to 25% of the original oil in place. More than 20 years of field experience of CO2 injection has advanced the CO2 technology. CO2 injection can be introduced gradually and use some of the same equipment currently in place for waterflooding. Saskatchewan's light and medium oil resource, representing nearly 45% of proven reserves, has been on waterflood for over 30 years and is fast approaching its economic limit of production(3). For the light and medium oil reservoirs in Saskatchewan, carbon dioxide or hydrocarbon injection is considered to be the most effective EOR process(4–6). These gases can be injected into the reservoir to develop miscible or immiscible conditions with the oil depending upon the operating pressure. Carbon dioxide is preferred over hydrocarbon gases (e.g., ethane, propane) because it is cheaper, has higher density, and offers environmental benefits by providing storage for CO2 in the reservoir. The Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) is conducting a comprehensive research program to assess the suitability of miscible CO2 displacement for reservoirs in southeast Saskatchewan and to optimize the field operating procedures. The first step in determining if a field is a viable CO2 flood candidate is to conduct a screening study to provide a reasonable estimate of CO2 injection performance. The minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is a key parameter used in the assessment. It has been recognized that the CO2 MMP for a reservoir oil depends on the reservoir temperature, oil composition, and the purity of injected CO2. The minimum miscibility pressure increases with increasing reservoir temperature.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».