Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
WHO NEEDS TRAINING? Every organization within the DAISY Consortium will require staff members who are trained in the creation of DAISY Digital Talking Books (DTB). In order to facilitate this huge undertaking a fully trained group of experts must be cultivated. Thus, the goal of the DAISY training program is to develop experts in the production and distribution of DAISY Digital Talking Books within all organizations in the DAISY Consortium. It is envisioned that these experts will then train the staff within their own organizations. Currently, there are few people who can be classified as Those few individuals who have devoted much of their time to help develop the standards and evaluate, test and advance the production software are qualified to be called experts. One of the initial tasks of this training program is to identify within each organization one or more people who have the potential to become experts. Another fundamental task is to determine how best to build and communicate the body of knowledge contained in the DAISY Consortium. In order to be an expert in the DAISY system, one must have knowledge of the DAISY specifications, the Structure Guidelines, XML, LpStudio/Pro (the authoring and recording software), and knowledge of the capabilities of the playback systems. Once a trainer understands these components and their interrelations, he or she can be classified as an expert. This is not a trivial endeavor, and to be successful the support mechanisms will need to be extensive. STRATEGY FOR WORLDWIDE TRAINING AND SUPPORT Developing expertise in every organization is the focus of the strategy for implementing a worldwide training and technical support program. Communication between existing experts and those on the road to becoming experts is key. For this reason, each organization has been encouraged to assign their key technical personnel to become participants of the & Technical Support Work Team (T&TS). It is this work team lead by Edmar Schut, SVB Netherlands, and Lynn Leith, CNIB Canada, that is charged with developing the strategy, goals, and implementation plans for the DAISY Consortium's training program. The training program is based on worldwide communication mechanisms, as outlined in the following paragraphs. EXPERTS TRAINING & TECHNICAL SUPPORT DISCUSSION LIST Experts and potential experts must be able to communicate easily and freely at any hour of the day or night, as there are participants literally around the world. The T&TS email discussion list provides this mechanism. Every member organization has one or more of its key people assigned to this team and registered on this list. It is here that proposals evolve, questions are answered, and problems posted to the most knowledgeable people in the world in the production of DAISY DTBs. It was here that volunteers came forward to participate in the testing of the LpStudio/Pro software. Others volunteered to help in the development of the Training used in the Train the Trainers program at regional centers. It will be here that difficult questions will be posted and through discussion, resolved. No person should feel alone, regardless of how far he or she may be from other producing sites with so many experts a simple email away. REGIONAL TRAINING CENTERS At the heart of Training and Technical Support is the concept of a Regional Training Center. Any DAISY Consortium member can establish itself as a regional training center. This is voluntary and the amount of service provided is dependant upon the regional training center's committed resources. It is expected that these centers will provide support to trainers in their geographical or language region. The regional training centers must have at least one expert trainer who can conduct training courses offered at that center. The Basic Training Course must be available from all training centers. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle