The Morphology of 16th-Century Slovak Administrative-Legal Texts and the Question of Diglossia in Pre-Codification Slovakia
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mark Richard Lauersdorf. The Morphology of 16th-Century Slovak AdministrativeLegal Texts and the Question of Diglossia in Pre-Codification Slovakia. Slavistische Beitrage, 473. Munich and Berlin: Verlag Otto Sagner, 2010. 293 pp. Maps. Tables. Index of cited forms. Bibliography. euro34.00, paper.Written Slovak was first codified in the 18th century by Anton Bernolak, who used generalized West Slovak as a basis. In the fervour of the nationalist movement of the following centuiy, Ludo vit Stur made a triumphantly successful second attempt at codification, this time with Central Slovak as the base interdialect. Literary Slovak was born. The sociolinguistics and language of the days of Bernolak and Stur have been well studied, but the status of written Slovak in earlier centuries is not fully documented or understood. From the dawn of written texts in the Slovak area in the 10th century, Latin, German, and finally Czech served as the medium of discourse in letters and legal communications. In the 15th century Czech became fixed as the norm for written expression. It was, Mark Richard Lauersdorf tells us, a classic example of literaiy diglossia in Ferguson's 1959 formulation.What was the nature of the diglossia in the 16th centuiy? Did the written language in time reveal a hybridization of the two varieties and a blurring of their boundaries? When did stable, unique interdialectal Slovak forms first start appearing, and what was the range of their appearance across the region? Pauliny called the written language of this time kulturna slovencina, dependent on Czech for syntax, but with Slovak more and more asserting itself, to the point that diglossia was turning into something else. But what?In this book Lauersdorf, author of a 1 996 monograph on Slovak phonology in the 1 6th centuiy, presents a very detailed study of 16th-century legal texts, 152 in all, many of them brief city council letters, selected from the four geographical areas: Moravian, West, Central and East Slovakia (MSk, WSk, CSk, ESk). He subjects these texts to a meticulous quantitative analysis of nine desinential features: 1st sg. non-past of I, II, III class verbs, inst. sg. of mase, andneut. nouns, dat. pi. of mase, andneut. nouns, instr. pi. of mase, and neut. nouns, loc. pi. of mase, and neut. nouns, gen.-dat.-loc. sg. of fern, hard-stem adjectives, loc. sg. of mase, and neut. hard-stem adjectives, dat. -loc. of 2nd sg. and refi, pronouns, 1st sg. pres, of the verb 'to be.'The presentation is impressive in its accuracy and detail. Historical development and regional dialects are discussed for each feature. Results are presented and analyzed by generalized patterning s, e. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle