Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue of the British Journal of Canadian Studies showcases a range of original research by emerging scholars writing about the literature of Canada. These scholars, drawn from the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe, represent the next generation of academics engaged in research, analysis and writing in the field of Canadian Studies.As with many projects, this issue began as a conversation between friends and colleagues - Christopher Kirkey, Director of the Center for the Study of Canada at State University of New York College at Plattsburgh, and Tony McCulloch, Senior Fellow in North American Studies at the UCL Institute of the Americas. Reflecting on the need to encourage younger scholars working on Canada, and building on a model already successfully employed by SUN Y Plattsburgh's CONNECT programme, the decision was taken in May 2013 to organise, promote and convene a colloquium at University College London in the summer of 2014. A call for papers was issued, aimed primarily at doctoral students and early-career professionals, and resulted in some thirty proposals. Twenty-one participants, from all over Europe and representing a variety of academic disciplines, subsequently presented their research at the 'Issues in Canadian Studies: New Voices on Canada' colloquium held at the UCL Institute of the Americas in Bloomsbur y, central London, between 10 and 12 July 2014.The colloquium featured, most prominently, a compelling focus on papers dedicated to Canadian literature. As editors - following formal presentations, extended discussions, and multiple academic peer reviews by several senior scholars - we chose to commit this issue of the BJCS to six essays grounded in the study of Canadian literature, broadly defined. We are also pleased to note that the authors of several other papers given at the colloquium have been encouraged to submit their work to the BJCS for consideration in future issues.In this special issue Sarah Galletly, from the UK but currently based in Australia, focuses on the highly popular Canadian author, Lucy Maud Montgomer y, and her often overlooked short fictional feature submissions to two prominent Canadian periodicals, Chatelaine and the Canadian Home Journal. Will Smith, also from the UK, examines two 'little-known popular novels', Hopkins Moorhouse's Every Man for Himself and Peter Donovan's Late Spring, and shows that these Toronto-based writers of the early twentieth century reflect and radiate the emergence of urban realist fiction in and about Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».