Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As veterinarians across the country struggle to adapt to a changing economic climate, the CVMA Business Management Program steps in with a helping hand. Based on feedback from the provinces, the CVMA Economic Survey Process has been improved to provide faster access to data. In the past, information from year 1 was collected in year 2 and presented in year 3 making the publication almost 2 years out of date. Now, 2009 data are compiled and reported in 2009, and within the first few months of 2010. The improvements are a result of requests submitted by several provincial associations. Hospitals valued the information provided in the reports, but wanted the information in a time frame that coincided with opportune times for change within the practice. The new timeline allows practice owners to receive reports faster and implement changes sooner. For example, provincial Fee Guides will be distributed January 1, 2010 since most hospitals wish to initiate fee changes at the start of the calendar year. Additionally, hospitals requested that Practice Diagnostic Reports be available earlier in the year in order to identify key areas that need be improved to effectively impact the hospital’s financial year. Therefore, the Practice Owner’s Economic Surveys are being distributed in September 2009 with a response deadline of October 15th, 2009. The earlier deadline will allow sufficient time to prepare the Practice Diagnostic Reports for January 2010. Spring is the time of year when most practices re-evaluate staff and consider wage increases or changes. Given this trend, the Non-DVM Wage Report will be provided in April 2010 and will give practices more relevant data to assist with decision-making concerning wages for non-DVM positions. The Associate Survey was re-introduced as the Associate Summer Survey, and even with a summer timeline, improved communications and marketing provided the highest response rate to date (25% at the time of publication). Improvements to the Associate Survey include the most up-to-date information available, being reported in real time. In the past, results were based on the previous year. This year, results from the 2009 Survey are based on 2009 figures. The Practice Owner’s Economic Survey is scheduled for distribution in September, with reports becoming available earlier in the year. Changes to the Practice Owner’s Survey include tracking staff discounts and a better breakdown of dental fees. Table 1 illustrates when hospitals can expect to receive surveys and reports. Table 1 Dates for practice owners economic surveys and reports To get the ball rolling, the 2009 CVMA Business Management Program kicks off the year with the 2009 associate wage data. The figures in Table 2 represent hourly wages paid to associate veterinarians nationally and in each province. Respondents were asked to provide information on the current year providing timely data for both associates and owners negotiating salaries. The figures are accurate to +/− 2.0%, 19 times out of 20. Information from Quebec will be available in November. Table 2 Hourly wages paid to associate veterinarians in 2009 Associate veterinarians in most provinces experienced wage gains with Newfoundland and Prince Edward Island enjoying double digit gains. Veterinarians in Ontario and Manitoba experienced decreases of 2% and 3%, respectively, pulling them below the national average for cost-of-living adjusted wages. For the first time in a long time, inflation was negative in most provinces providing an opportunity for most associates to realize an increase in spending power regardless of their wage increase. After adjustments were made for variances in the cost-of-living, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia top the list with the highest wages. Veterinarians in the eastern provinces earned higher than the national average, while veterinarians in the west earned below the national average. For a detailed report on compensation and benefits, consult the CVMA Associate Compensation and Benefits Report for your province.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,114 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,534 | 0,524 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».