MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2181825282 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2001.0000

Nostalgia and Recollection in Victorian Culture by Ann C. Colley (review)

2001· article· en· W2181825282 sur OpenAlex
Hao Li

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUnconscious mindConsciousnessSensibilityRecallPoetryAestheticsPsychoanalysisCollective unconsciousArtLiteratureHistoryPsychologyPhilosophyCognitive psychologyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews Ann C. Colley. Nostalgia and Recollection in Victorian Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998. ? + 218. Speaking of Baudelaire's poetry, Walter Benjamin once highlighted two kinds of remembrance in the light of Freud's notion of the unconscious. x One kind traces the past in sequential time and in consciousness. It filters out aspects of past experience, thus avoiding derailing one's mental balance; the past can then be turned into a memorable and retrievable experience. The other kind invades one's unconscious. It disrupts the sense of continuous time, captures the intensity of past conditions and restores what consciousness tends to screen out. The sensations generated can be distressing, shocking and traumatic. Nostalgia, one would assume, leans towards the security of the first kind. When a familiar past is evoked, it may generate a sad but reassuring longing, not necessarily comfortable, but most likely comforting enough to be indulged in. The merit of Ann C. Colley's recent book lies in its understanding of nostalgia to be more than just such a longing. Through close analyses of a range of Victorian writings and paintings, Colley explores how nostalgia for the Victorians not only offers reassurance but also gestures towards the unexpected and the undesirable. The sensibility that detects such dual and often antithetical impact of the past is both subtle and astute. The focus of Colley's book, though, is not on nostalgia as an unconscious (in Freud's sense), non-referential, or pathologically traumatic manifestation. She goes back to a pre-Benjaminian time to uncover forms of nostalgia that, in her view, do not "necessarily expose the antitheses and ironies imbedded in our postmodern sensibility" (4). Unlike our own age that "promotes a nostalgia without memory" (4), she sees her chosen writers and artists as belonging to "a culture that finds in [the past] a means of resolving (rather than creating) tension or difference. The past gives them a way of discovering synthesis" (4). The role of nostalgia is thus "an organizing force in the imagination and memory" (1). Colley's framing of the issue may help us to understand better her principle of selection: "I have selected a group of Victorian British Victorian Review1 23 Reviews writers and artists whose work emerges from recollection and whose texts consciously take their shape from a sense of loss and a yearning for home" (1). She further clarifies, "I concentrate . . . upon their longing for a past that is confined to the span of their own lifetime" (1), a "more immediate nostalgia" (2). The book is mainly structured around the cause of nostalgia physical and psychological displacements - through themes such as voyages, exile, and the recollection of childhood. Part One concentrates on "Voyages and Exile." Individual chapters are devoted respectively to Charles Darwin's The Voyage of the Beagle, Ford Madox Brown's painting The Lastof England, Robert Louis Stevenson's letters and Elizabeth Gaskell's fiction. The chapter on TheLastof Englandis particularly thorough and persuasive. Part Two ("Childhood Spaces") examines Stevenson's A Child's Garden of Verses (an excellent chapter), John Ruskin's Praeterita, and Walter Pater's "The Child in the House." It explores how these writers "let their memories resuscitate the dialogue their bodies had once had" with their childhood spaces, through "the invisible body" in Ruskin, "the aesthetic body" in Pater, and "the ubiquitous body" in Stevenson (125). The first chapter of Part Three ("The Idea of Recollection") analyzes the illustrations, drawings and optical metaphors in Stevenson's essays, letters and other writings; the remaining chapter traces the evolution of J. M. W Turner's engravings in the light of Henri Bergson's theory that "memory does not consist in a regression from the present to the past, but, on the contrary, in a progress from the past to the present" (qtd. in 192), showing how remembrance manages to "initiate, develop, and modify his pictures' images" (197). With an outstanding command of details, the book offers a crossgenre study of the various representations of nostalgia. The generic range is admirable - novels, poetry, autobiography, letters, travel literature, paintings and engravings - conjuring up a converging discourse on the subject. Instead of placing the works in their generic histories and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle