Negotiated Care Improves Fluid Status in Diabetic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Volume overload is common in diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD), especially when the patient's residual renal function decreases with time on PD. Due to the higher dietary salt and fluid intake, diabetic PD patients tend to use more hypertonic glucose solution to remove excess fluid, which in turn may lead to increased membrane permeability. In the present study, we investigated the effect of negotiated care on fluid status in diabetic PD patients. METHODS: All diabetic PD patients who had been on PD for at least 3 months by the end of year 2002 in the First Hospital of Peking University were included in the present study. A primary nurse was assigned to each patient and intensive patient education was implemented, focusing on the importance of dietary salt and fluid restriction, the detrimental effect of using more hypertonic glucose solution, and the consequence of fluid overload. Decisions on dialysis prescriptions were made after extensive discussion among the primary nurse, nephrologists, patients, and patients' families. A patient support group was also involved when it was necessary. All the patients were followed for 1 year and fluid status, compliance to dietary restriction, and dialysis prescription were evaluated before the start and at the end of the study. RESULTS: There were 30 diabetic PD patients (age 65.4 +/- 10.3 years; on PD for 24.5 +/- 19.9 months, range 3 - 66 months) included in the study when it was started. During the 1 year of follow-up, 4 patients died of diabetic complications, 3 patients were transferred to hemodialysis due to resistant peritonitis, and 2 patients were transplanted. By the end of follow-up, 21 patients remained on PD, among whom 15 had improved fluid status, 4 did not change, and 2 had worsened fluid status as assessed by clinical and bio-impedance evaluation. Patient compliance to dietary salt and fluid restriction had increased from 19.5% to 76.2%. During the follow-up, 8 patients were anuric at the beginning of the study and the remaining 22 patients had declining residual renal function. Only 4 patients increased their use of hypertonic solution including 2.5% (3 patients) and 4.25% (1 patient) glucose, whereas 5 patients decreased their use of 2.5% dialysis solution. By the end of follow-up, only 1 of the 21 patients was using 4.25% glucose solution and all the patients had good blood glucose control. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that negotiated care can be successfully used in diabetic PD patients. It helps to minimize the use of hypertonic glucose solution and improves patient compliance to dietary restriction of salt and fluid intake, and thus improves their fluid status.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».