Hello My name is Michel Cormier. I'm the acting commissioner for the Plant Breeders' Rights Office in Canada which is part of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Canadian Plant Breeders’ Rights Act required at the tim e that the Act came into effect that we, that a review be conducted to document the effect of the legislation after 10 years of implementation and this review was conducted and tabled in Parliament in 2002. The purpose of the 10 -year review was to assess how the Plant Breeders’ Rights Act resulted in stimulating investment in plant breeding, improving access to foreign varieties, protecting Canadian varieties abroad, improving varieties to the benefit of the public such as farmers and nurserymen and any ot her public advantage, so during that period of review it was identified that Canadian farmers and nurserymen obtained greater access to more and better varieties with increased yield, increased disease resistance and increased drought tolerance. The Plant Breeders’ Rights Act appeared to have had the most impact on access to foreign varieties; for example in the first year that the Act was implemented 97 per cent of our applications for potato varieties were from foreign breeders. Plant variety protection enabled the industry sector to develop partnerships, links and improved access to foreign varieties. Some horticulture and agriculture industries improved their export capabilities or they became net exporters of their products, particularly in floricult ure, the pulse and potato and nursery industries. For example processed potato exports went up by 200 million in seven years. During the vie, pardon me, during the review period the number of companies and organizations in Canada which were involved with , in the seed industry increased by 40 per cent, so overall the rate of variety development and availability of new varieties in Canada increased faster during the 10 years after the Act was implemented than ever before and the Plant Breeders’ Rights Act a ppears to be one factor of many that has had a positive impact on the availability of new varieties.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».