MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2183670323

What Do Orchestral Instruments Bring to Music Therapy? Developing My Voice on the Oboe and English Horn as a Music Therapist/Quel Est L'apport Des Instruments D'orchestre À la Musicothérapie? Trouver Ma Voix Au Moyen Du Hautbois et Du Cor Anglais En Tant Que Musicothérapeute

2014· article· fr· W2183670323 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
A.S. Berends

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Music Education Insights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOboeMusic therapyPsychologyFrench hornMusicalDocumentationPsychotherapistPedagogyVisual artsArtFluteComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Because music therapy is primarily relational, an in-depth investigation of the means by which client and therapist relate is essential. As Lee (1996) wrote in a case study, saw the opportunity for a description of music therapy in which the verbal and musical voices of client and therapist combine to express the of the process (p. 2). Similarly, the search for this essence was a motivating force behind the research presented here.The double reed family of instruments, of which the oboe and the English horn are members, brings its distinct age-old sounds to orchestral and chamber music around the world. However, the oboe and English horn world is small, and the number of music therapists who use these instruments in therapy is even smaller. Documentation of the therapeutic qualities of the oboe and English horn are absent from music therapy literature. This qualitative case study builds a foundation for future study on double reed instruments in music therapy by providing a preliminary overview of the themes for inquiry. This study portrays the interactions of an adolescent client and music therapist over four sessions when the therapist used the oboe and English horn in sessions.Music-Centeredness and Stance of ResearcherMusic-centeredness (Aigen, 2005; Lee, 2003; Nordoff & Robbins, 1977/2007) is integral to the framework of this study and is essential to my position as music therapist and researcher. I identify with music-centered psychotherapy as my approach, combining music-centered values with psychotherapeutic techniques. Over the course of my music therapy training, 1 have been honing my clinical improvisation skills, especially on piano and on oboe. This study focused on my use of the oboe and English horn in clinical improvisation.My relationship with the oboe has taught me various things. For one, it has given me an appreciation for single-line music-making, or melody. It has taught me perseverance, especially with the art of reed-making. The oboe challenges my sense of beauty with the effort it takes to maintain a dark, lush sound. The oboe also challenges me in clinical settings, to make the doublereed tone warm and welcoming.Although I do not use the oboe exclusively in sessions with clients, I am fascinated with its clinical qualities and believe these cannot be separated from the client's experience of the instrument. Through this study, I hope that music therapists will acknowledge the need for further research in orchestral instrument work, as my own motivation for using the oboe in music therapy is fueled by substantive evidence of its clinical potential.Literature ReviewThe Music Therapist's Use of His or Her Major InstrumentMusic therapists in North America often use piano or guitar to support clients in music therapy. Usually orchestral instrumentalists will temporarily or permanently abandon their own instruments in music therapy sessions, setting aside instruments that have been a major part of their lives. Voyajolu (2009) surveyed 249 music therapists in the United States to determine how many had abandoned their major performing instruments for use in music therapy. The results showed that 62.9% of woodwinds, 57.1% of strings, and 76.9% of brass instrumentalists did not use their main instrument in music therapy practice within the year prior.At the 2011 Canadian Association for Music Therapy conference in Winnipeg, Carolyn Kenny challenged music therapists to pursue ethically sound practice by encouraging students to use their main instruments:For education and training, I suggest that we challenge our students to find their own definitions of beauty. I recommend that we encourage them to stay committed to their primary instrument of choice, which is an important expression of soul. (Kenny, 2011, para. 32)As suggested by Kenny, preparing the student music therapist for music therapy practice can be achieved by grounding students in the strength of their relationship with their principal instrument. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,887
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian journal of music therapyMême sujetDiverse Music Education InsightsTravaux en français237 207