MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2183699387 · doi:10.1037/a0039344

Setting the stage for an evidence-based model of psychotherapy supervisor development in clinical psychology.

2015· article· en· W2183699387 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Gosselin, Keegan K. Barker, Cary S. Kogan, Myriam Pomerleau, Marie-Pier Pitre d'Ioro

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCounseling Practices and Supervision
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyPsychotherapistSupervisorManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Canada and in the United States, psychotherapy has been defined as a core professional competency within mental health professions, and more specifically in clinical and counselling psychology (Canadian Psychological Association, 2002; Falender et al., 2004). However, how supervisors develop competencies in psychotherapy remains an understudied area (Barker & Hunsley, 2013; Belleville & Viau-Quesnel, 2014; Watkins, 2012b). Given that (a) psychotherapy supervisors do not spontaneously acquire skills necessary for supervising effectively (Hoffman, 1994), (b) experience alone does not adequately prepare one to become a psychotherapy supervisor (Worthington, 2006), and (c) the development of specific competencies are necessary for the ethical and professional practice of psychotherapy (Watkins, 2012b), it is crucial that we increase our understanding of makes for the effective teaching of effective supervision (Hunsley & Barker, 2011, p. 144). This study aims to provide a critical assessment of the existing literature using a BES methodology to inform future research and the development of Canadian training and practice guidelines in this area.A Proposed Definition of Psychotherapy Supervisor DevelopmentOne of the major challenges in this area of research has been a lack of a clear conceptualisation of what psychotherapy supervisor development is and how it works. A definition is an important starting point for any assessment of the research literature by delineating the construct; that is, what constitutes psychotherapy supervisor development and what does not. Given that a systematic review tries to identify, appraise, select, and synthesize all high quality research evidence on a given research question, a sound definition provides a clear frame of reference to orient and anchor its execution. This is especially necessary in this case, because whereas there have been numerous reviews in the area of clinical/ psychotherapy (at least 32 by the mid-90s) and more since then (Ellis, Ladany, Krengel, & Schult, 1996; Milne & James, 2000; Milne, Sheikh, Pattison, & Wilkinson, 2011), only a few have focused on psychotherapy supervisor development per se (see Barker & Hunsley, 2013). This distinction is crucial, because it is the difference between reporting on what works for delivery of clinical/psychotherapy versus how a supervisor becomes effective at delivering what works.To help us formulate a valid and useful definition for the construct of supervisor development, we are guided by Milne (2007), who noted four criteria necessary for a useful definition: (a) precision (e.g., it has an essential meaning that makes it distinct); (b) specificity (e.g., it defines a concept clearly and completely); (c) operationalization (e.g., it is stated in a form that permits measurement); and (d) corroboration (e.g., it receives adequate support from research). A reasonable starting point for formulating a definition of psychotherapy supervisor development was recently proposed by Watkins (2012a):The process of growth involved in being and becoming a psychotherapy supervisor, its unfolding and evolution over time; the factors (e.g., openness, defensiveness) that facilitate or fracture that growth process; the developmental issues (e.g., independence vs. dependence) that potentially affect and permeate that process; and the tailoring of supervisory interventions to match of needs. (p. 46)This definition represents a synthesis of Watkins' review of 30 years of literature on the subject of psychotherapy supervisor development and incorporates concepts from all four extant developmental models that describe how supervisors develop their skills and professional identities (Hess, 1987; Roenhauser, 1994; Stoltenberg & McNeill, 2009; Watkins, 2012a).However, when Milne's (2007) criteria are applied to Watkins' (2012a) definition of psychotherapy supervisor development, several gaps and limitations become apparent:(a) The process of growth involved in being and becoming a psychotherapy supervisor is not defined precisely in behavioural terms, that is, what is meant by growth and development? …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,698
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,450
Tête enseignante GPT0,485
Écart entre enseignants0,035 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneMême sujetCounseling Practices and SupervisionTravaux en français237 207