<i>Editorial Commentary:</i>Our Evolving Understanding of Legionellosis Epidemiology: Learning to Count
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
disease is also farther on the road to being cured when it breaks forth from concealment and manifests its power (Seneca, ca. 4 bc-65 ad) [1]. Legionella pneumophila burst onto the medical scene ~3 decades ago as the causative pathogen in a respiratory disease outbreak among American Legion conventioneers at Philadelphia's grand Bellevue Stratford Hotel [2]. As a result of the outbreak, 182 people became sick, 29 died, the hotel went out of business, and, ultimately, clinicians were introduced to a novel, virulent pathogen. The initial identification of legionellosis in the context of a large and virulent outbreak and the subsequent recognition of case clusters associated with cooling towers, fountains, and grocery store mist machines [3] did much to cement the perception of L pneumophila as an agent of respiratory outbreaks associated with inhalation of contaminated droplets. In the nosocomial field, such outbreaks have been associated with case-fatality rates exceeding 40% [4]. However, many clinicians now recognize that legionellosis is an important cause of sporadic community-acquired pneumonia and a relatively common cause of community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to the intensive care unit [5]. As sensitive and noninvasive diagnostic options have expanded, so has the perceived spectrum of illness associated with Legionella species. A recent article by von Baum and colleagues [6] suggested that, when individuals with ambulatory communityacquired pneumonia are tested for legionellosis by urine antigen testing, nearly 4% may receive a diagnosis of legionellosis. Understanding of the links between the physical environment and legionellosis risk has undergone a parallel evolution. Legionella species are present in surface waters and ground water [7], and pathogenic species of Legionella frequently can be isolated from home and hospital waterdistribution systems, even in the presence of chlorine (and in the absence of identified outbreaks). The finding that monochloramination of potable water supplies (which is far more effective at killing Legionella species than is chlorination) is associated with a reduction in nosocomial legionellosis outbreaks [8] suggests that exposure to this uncommon pathogen via drinking water may actually be common. The association among advanced age, deficient immune status, and severe legionellosis likely results from a high frequency of microaspiration and the inability to clear aspirated organisms in individuals with these characteristics. In this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Neil and Berkelman [9] provide a succinct and thought-provoking summary of recent trends in legionellosis in the United States. They report that the incidence of legionellosis increased markedly in the United States from 2002 through 2005. Should we be concerned that the incidence of a virulent infectious disease
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».