Accuracy Improvement for Measurement of Gas Diffusivity through Thin Porous Media
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Accurate measurement of the gas diffusion coefficient through porous media is of significant interest to science and engineering applications including mass transfer through soils, building materials, and fuel cells to name a few. Accurate measurements are necessary for simulation and optimization of complex systems involving gas transport. The Loschmidt cell, or closed tube method has been extensively used to measuring the binary gas diffusion coefficient of gas pairs. Recent studies have used a modified Loschmidt cell with an additional porous sample to measure the effective diffusion coefficient through the porous sample. The method employs what is called the resistance network method for calculating the effective diffusion coefficient through the porous sample. \n \nIn this study, a one-dimensional simulation was developed to evaluate the accuracy of the resistance network method with a modified Loschmidt cell. Dimensionless parameters are shown to be applicable for both the conventional Loschmidt cell as well as the modified Loschmidt cell with the porous sample. A parametric simulation study was performed to show that the error relates closely to the ratio of diffusive resistances of the sample and bulk gas denoted as the resistance ratio, Ω*. With a simulated experimental duration of 250s, which is typical of experiments in literature, the error was found to be negligible when Ω* < 0.1 but increased dramatically for Ω* > 0.1 up to a maximum of approximately 20% error. The equivalent Fourier number, Fo_eq, based on the equivalent diffusivity, D_eq, was proposed as an approximate expression for the degree to which the concentration gradient in the test cell has evolved. It was found that the error has nearly a linear relationship with Fo_eq. Since a lower Fo_eq means a less decayed profile with significant transience remaining, as Fo_eq drops, the the error increases. By controlling the simulation test length for different thickness and diffusivity samples such that Fo_eq = 12.5, the error was reduced to less than 1% over most of the range of parameters and less than 6% over the full range of parameters spanning two orders of magnitude for both thickness and diffusivity. \n \nThe resistance network method requires the measurement of the sample thickness, a diffusion length, and two diffusion coefficients using with the modified Loschmidt cell (one with the porous sample and one without). Analysis found that the equation used for calculating the effective diffusion coefficient, D_eff, through the porous sample inherently magnifies the relative uncertainty of the measured values in the final calculated value for D_eff. When Ω* < 1, the percentage uncertainty in both diffusion coefficient measurements could potentially be magnified by one or more orders of magnitude. To mitigate uncertainty in D_eff, Ω* must be greater than 1 to ensure that the uncertainty is magnified by no more than a factor of 2. \n \nThis study recommends that modified Loschmidt experiments aim for Ω* = 1 and Fo_eq = 12.5 to greatly reduce the error and uncertainty in the measurement of D_eff.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».