Response to the authors of the open letter to the people in Gaza
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
n June 12, the day three Israeli teens were abducted and murdered in the West Bank, Hamas began launching rockets aimed at Israeli civilians. For three weeks Israel showed restraint, but Hamas’ incessant missile attacks continued, cul-minating in a barrage of 70 missiles fired on July 7 alone. Israel was left with no choice but to embark on a military operation to defend its civilian population. There was no word from the authors of the “open letter” [1]. For several years Hamas, designated a terrorist organization in many countries including the USA, the EU and Canada, has invested heavily in a formidable terror infrastructure that includes some 12,000 missiles covering most of Israel’s territory. It has also built dozens of attack tunnels with the sole purpose of infiltrating Israel to conduct terror attacks killing and kidnap-ping Israeli civilians. Again, total ignorance on the part of the authors or any others in the European medical community.The main objective of Operation Protective Edge is to restore calm to Israel’s citizens. Israel’s right to defend itself was widely recognized by the international community, including most recently EU foreign ministers on July 22. Israel’s actions are aimed at curtailing Hamas terror capabilities in Gaza; they do not target the people of Gaza.In this context, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has done its utmost to minimize harm to uninvolved civilians. It strictly abides by the principles of international law and the Law of Armed Conflict, which calls for a distinction between civil-ians and military forces, and for careful consideration of the expected military gain of any action weighed against the poten -tial collateral damage.Among the measures taken by the IDF to minimize the risk to Palestinian civilians are prior announcements about impending attacks by means of phone calls, pamphlets and warning shots. In many cases missions were aborted because civilians dangerously close to the target were identified. What other army does that?Whereas Israel is conducting itself with extreme care so as not to harm civilians, Hamas acts in flagrant violation of international law and with utter disregard for human life, whether Israeli or Palestinian. It has systematically committed a double war crime: the deliberate targeting of Israeli civilians while using its own civilian population for cover.Indeed, Hamas has perfected the “human shield” tactic, hiding weapons and terrorists in hospitals, schools and mosques. In at least two instances UNRWA found missiles hidden in its schools, and journalists reported having seen Hamas leaders hiding in the Shifa Hospital. In addition, Hamas has urged and even forced civilians to remain where the fighting is taking place, to deter Israel from attacking.Israel agreed to the Egyptian brokered ceasefire of July 15, but Hamas rejected it. Israel approved two humanitarian win-dows to ease the burden on the civilian population in Gaza, but Hamas broke the ceasefire on both occasions.Our learned colleagues, the authors of the letter to
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,015 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».