Mindfulness-based medical practice: a mixed-methods investigation of an adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction program for health care professionals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The necessity of providing health care professionals with tangible tools to manage stress and safeguard their own well-being has become increasingly apparent. Rates of burnout in the helping professions are rising; the consequences of clinician distress for patient care have been highlighted in recent literature. Past research has examined the potential for Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) to act as an adjunctive intervention for various clinical problems, including but not limited to chronic pain, for over 25 years. Presently, the applications of this program are burgeoning with health care professionals, for whom the intervention holds the promise of promoting both personal and clinical benefits. Past research has examined outcomes of MBSR in health care professionals such as burnout, empathy, perceived stress, as well as medical and psychological symptoms such as depression or anxiety. The current program of research sought to expand on existing research by examining positive psychological outcomes such as well-being, as well as potential mechanisms of change such as mindful attention, and self-compassion. Quantitative and qualitative methods were employed to provide a broad portrait of how change is experienced by health care professionals engaged in the program. This dissertation comprises three manuscripts that collectively contribute to the literature. The first manuscript provides a focused literature review, summarizing the empirical literature on MBSR for health care professionals specifically. The second manuscript utilized self-report measures to explore benefits of engaging in Mindfulness-Based Medical Practice (MBMP), an adapted version of MBSR for health care professionals which includes training in mindful communication. The program was completed by a sample of 51 physicians, psychologists, social workers, nurses, and other health care professionals in two cohorts during the spring of 2008 and 2009. Findings provide initial evidence of the effectiveness of MBMP as demonstrated by significant decreases in perceived stress, and increases in mindful attention and awareness and self-compassion. Bootstrapped hierarchical regression analyses failed to reveal a moderating effect of either mindfulness or self-compassion on the negative relationship between perceived stress and well-being. The third manuscript presents a study which investigated participants' experiences of the 8-week course through focus group interviews (n = 27). A grounded theory analysis yielded a model highlighting unique change processes for practicing health care professionals in relation to enhanced awareness of perfectionism, self-criticism, and orientation to others. Participants described achieving personal outcomes such as changes in self-care attitudes and practices, as well as implications for clinical encounters with patients. This study provides one of the first in-depth qualitative investigations of practicing health care professionals' experiences of an MBSR program. Taken together, the three manuscripts provide a solid rationale for future research on the potential for MBSR to enrich the lives of health care professionals and the patients they serve.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».