Notice bibliographique
Résumé
These days, the talk about sexual minority rights is growing momentum. Homosexuality has found acceptance in many countries such a United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Most of these countries are economically developed. Whether such a quality is necessary for any society to accept homosexuality might remain a possibility although some religious interpretations might prohibit it altogether. Recently, homosexuality has become a hotly debated issue in India since the filing of criminal charges against Non-governmental Organizations working for the betterment of homosexuals. The law that has come into focus in section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Although the law per se does not prohibit homosexuality, it prohibits non-procreative sex. This too is limited to the gay community. The law does not even seem to dwell even for a second the possibility of lesbianism. Till date, the law has been used mainly against the male gender although there have been instances where they have been applied against lesbians and transsexuals. However, there is no case where a homosexual person has been jailed due to his/her sexual preference, having consented to sexual intercourse. The law has mostly been used against child predators. The government has taken the stance that removing the law will take away the only law that deals with pedophiles. However, this remains an unsatisfactory argument since other sections of the I.P.C could be amended so as to include such a provision. Also, the fact remains that the law seeks to infringe Article 21 of the Constitution of India which gives every citizen of India, the right to privacy. However, privacy in Govind v. State of M.P was restricted to pro-creative activities. Therefore, even though homosexuality is far from dominant an issue, it remains a sensitive issue in this country. The consequences of legalizing it could lead to great political ramifications and would require great will to bring about. Hence, the authors propose to examine homosexuality in India under two headings (i) constitutionality; and (ii) ethicality. We hope to generate a debate on whether something constitutional can outweigh anything unethical and also try to imagine the situation if Section 377 is amended.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».