MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W219274365

Bagging Europe's groceries

2000· article· en· W219274365 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Gurdjian, George Kerschbaumer, Michael Kliger, Johanna Waterous

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe McKinsey Quarterly · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueMerger and Competition Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompetitor analysisConsolidation (business)BusinessHomogeneousMarket shareQuarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)GeographyMarketingFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Takeovers in Europe's grocery-retailing sector work best on the national level. But pressure to grow and the factor are forcing big supermarket chains to look abroad. European grocery retailers are on a shopping spree. The results of a McKinsey analysis of the 400 largest acquisitions in the sector show that the volume of corporate takeovers more than quadrupled--rising from $2.9 billion to $12.4 billion--between 1994 and 1998 (Exhibit 1, on the next spread). Yet a comparison with North America's retail grocery sector suggests that its European counterpart is only at the beginning of a period of consolidation. For, while the top five companies in the United States have a 35 percent share of the US market, the top five in Europe have only a 26 percent share of theirs. Until recently, grocery retailers in Canada and the United States dominated a region or two at most. Today, the strongest have extended their hegemony to multiple markets, and these super-regional market leaders are earning higher returns than their smaller competitors. At the beginning of the 1990s, European grocery retailers grew mostly at the national level: from 1991 to 1994, the top ten realized almost 90 percent of their growth at home. In the next four years, the tables turned: almost half of the growth recorded then stemmed from European cross-border expansion, mostly by acquisition--a trend that is accelerating. Consumer tastes are more homogeneous in the United States than they are in Europe, and this makes it harder for European grocery retailers to realize advantages of scale and scope by operating across different European markets. But there is a general trend toward converging tastes and lifestyles, particularly among younger consumers in Europe, and it will speed up with the introduction of the euro, since cross-border shopping will become more common and manufacturers will sell increasing numbers of identical products in many European markets. Despite the numerous obstacles, European retailers must therefore act now. Leadership positions in the European grocery retailing sector will be decided during the next couple of years--indeed, perhaps in only months. We believe that the industry is likely to develop in one of two ways: either a European grocery champions' league or strong regional fortresses. It is too early to say which outcome will prevail, but we can analyze the important drivers, such as capital markets and competitive pressures, as well as the economic rationale behind the present wave of consolidation. Leaders under pressure A look at the composition of the market value of grocery retailers such as METRO (Germany) and Casino (France) shows that current cash flows account for only one-third of their capitalization and investors' growth expectations for the rest. Since such retailers are active mainly in saturated markets, growth could stem either from international expansion or from acquisitions. By contrast, British retailers such as Safeway and Sainsbury don't carry a growth premium; their current performance almost completely explains their current market value. Because these companies seem to lack the credibility needed for future growth, they suffer from low market-to-book valuations, which put management under heavy pressure and make them potential targets for takeover. The factor increases such pressures. Since moving into Germany, with the acquisition of Wertkauf (1997) and Interspar (1998), and into the United Kingdom, with the acquisition of ASDA (1999), the US company has shown that it sees Europe as more than a test market. The French chains Carrefour and Promodes reacted quickly to Wal-Mart by announcing their merger, putting them one step ahead of competitors in Belgium, France, Portugal, South America, Spain, and elsewhere. Meanwhile, after years of making acquisitions solely outside Europe, Ahold (based in the Netherlands) acquired 50 percent of ICA, the leading Scandinavian grocery retailer. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,160

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0480,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,192
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe McKinsey QuarterlyMême sujetMerger and Competition AnalysisTravaux en français237 207