MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2193009917

Alike and Different: Canadian and American Music Therapists' Lives and Work/Semblables et Différents : La Vie et le Travail De Musicothérapeutes Canadiens et Américains

2015· article· fr· W2193009917 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra L. Curtis

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languefr
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMusic Therapy and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiversity (politics)ImmigrationMelting potPopulationIdentity (music)CitizenshipStyle (visual arts)SociologyPsychologyGender studiesHistoryPolitical scienceAestheticsDemographyAnthropologyArtLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A recent survey (Curtis, 2013) examined the experiences of and American music therapists, comparing men and women with each other as well as comparing the respondents with their 1990 counterparts (Curtis, 1990). In terms of the respondents' work and personal lives, results indicated instances of notable differences on the one hand and remarkable similarities on the other hand. Since 1990 the music therapy professions in Canada and the United States have evolved dramatically. As well, there is a widespread understanding among Canadians that while we may have much in common with our neighbours to the south, there are incontestable differences that make for two distinct cultures. Questions arise: How does this play out in terms of present-day and American music therapy, and what are the implications of these distinctions?There has been some exploratory literature concerning the nature of the music therapy profession, but this was limited in scope (Kirkland, 2002, 2007). In discussing the issue, Kirkland (2007) commented that there is a national identity that is distinctly Canadian (para. 22), provided that an identity is understood as one that embraces diversity in terms of its educational and clinical practice approaches. This might be in part supported by several factors: the nature of Canada, given its immense geography and small population; Canada's diversity of culture, which typically embraces a garden-salad style as opposed to the traditional American melting pot; and a lack of music therapy education, necessitating training abroad until relatively recently1 (Citizenship & Immigration Canada, 2012; Malinder, 2012; Palmer, 1976; Study Mode, 2002). These unique features of the landscape (geographic, political, cultural, and educational) may work in combination to create a greater heterogeneity of the music therapy profession and practice. Sutton (2007) underscored this diversity in his description of music therapy in northern Canada, informed by a unique history, climate, geography, and people. This diversity in Canada was further detailed in Kirkland's (2007) examination of music therapy history, education, and practice across some of the other provinces. Curtis's description of the changing landscape of music therapy in Quebec (2011, para. 1) further attests to this diversity in its identification of a distinct Quebecois music therapy context.While this anecdotal literature makes reference to a distinct and diverse music therapy identity, little research exists concerning the experience itself or the experience in comparison to that of American music therapists. The present survey report helps to address this research gap. It entails analysis of data gathered from an earlier survey of music therapists (Curtis, 2013) designed to provide a comparative analysis of women and men music therapists' experiences as compared to each other as well as to survey results from 1990 (Curtis, 1990). This report on the 2013 survey focuses on comparing the experiences of and American music therapists-on the commonalities and differences in their situations, their practices, their approaches, and their personal, work, and family concerns. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of relevant survey data are used to examine the question: In what ways are and American music therapists alike and different?MethodParticipantsThe survey was distributed to all professional members of the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) and the Association for Music Therapy (CAMT) living in the United States or Canada. A total of 2,040 (1,733 AMTA and 307 CAMT) survey requests were sent, with 150 returned because of non-functioning email accounts, for a total of 1,890 contacts made. The return rate was 36%, with 682 individuals responding. This is a conservative return rate as some respondents may have been members of both the AMTA and CAMT. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,588
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian journal of music therapyMême sujetMusic Therapy and HealthTravaux en français237 207