Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background \nThere is growing evidence suggest the link between health and feeding practice in early postnatal period, which is a critical window for development. Given the rate of type 2 diabetes is increasing and infant feeding is modifiable, understanding the association between infant feeding and subsequent diabetic risks may provide a potential effective strategy to combat the epidemic. \n \nObjective \nSystematically review the association of infant formula feeding and subsequent diabetic risks. \n \nMethods \nThe PubMed electronic database was used for literature searching. English papers assessing the association between formula feeding and major clinical markers of type 2 diabetes including diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose concentration, HbA1c and insulin resistance were included. \n \nResults \nData were extracted from 15 studies (four randomized controlled trials, four cross-sectional studies and seven cohort studies). All four randomized controlled trials, three cross-sectional studies and three cohort studies reported higher diabetic risks in formula-fed participants comparing to breast-fed participants. No association between infant feeding and diabetic risks was reported in the remaining five studies. All but two included studies were conducted in western countries, including the USA, Canada, the UK, France and the Netherlands. The two studies in non-western setting also found higher fasting glucose concentration in formula-fed infants. Two RCTs suggested that lower protein formula had protective effects on diabetic risks compared with higher protein formula. Only one study assessed but found no dose-response association between infant formula consumption and later diabetic risks. Among all 11 observational studies, only 6of them adjusted for maternal socioeconomic position, which was an important confounder, especially in western countries where mothers of high socioeconomic position are more likely to choose breastfeeding and breastfeed for longer, and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was lower among those with higher SEP, therefore the published benefits of breastfeeding on preventing T2DMin such settings might be overestimated if SEP was not adjusted. \n \nConclusion \nThe current evidence suggested that in comparison with breast-fed individuals, formula-fed individuals may have greater subsequent diabetic risks, indicated by higher fasting glucose, insulin resistance or lower insulin sensitivity. However, published evidence is not strong due to the possible residual confounding from SEP. Further epidemiological studies are needed to assess the potential health impact of infant feeding in subsequent health, especially in the Asia countries where breastfeeding maybe less socially pattern and the rate of diabetics is on an increase.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».