Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The articles in this edition of Social Alternatives focus on elections - the lead-up to elections, election campaigns and the aftermath of elections as governments take up office and seek to implement their policies. The articles also examine different aspects of elections in different jurisdictions - elections conducted under different electoral systems that decide who can vote, how the votes are tallied and final electoral outcomes. They examine elections in jurisdictions with long-standing stable democracies and in countries where democracy has been overthrown and restored. In one case, the ballot is to decide not who will govern, but whether a new independent country should be formed. Some articles consider what happens after the election, including the impact of electoral change on parliamentary institutions and the importance of leadership style. Scrutiny is applied to the way elected governments go about the implementation of policy, whether they keep their promises and what ideological drivers affect their actions. The difficulties of translating the words uttered in election campaigns such as 'balanced budgets' and 'renegotiation of European Union powers' are analysed. Many common themes emerge in these articles despite the different jurisdictions considered and the diverse topics examined.The first article 'Campbell Newman and the Weaknesses of the Strong Leader' by Todd Winther examines the comparative literature on leadership demonstrating the relevance of analysis from other democracies such as the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States to Queensland. In 2012, the Queensland ALP government suffered a resounding defeat retaining only seven parliamentary seats. The Newman LNP government took office with a huge majority. Yet less than three years later, in a major electoral surprise, it too was defeated. In analysing the reasons for this defeat, Winther allocates responsibility to the Premier Campbell Newman and the LNP's reliance on his strong leadership. Newman had been put into the leadership of the party by the party machine following his successful tenure as Brisbane's Lord Mayor believing that he was the strong leader the party needed to regain government. Strong leadership has been equated with successful leadership both in political practice and in theoretical literature. But as Winther explains, this analysis is too simplistic. Both the literature and political experience indicate that successful leadership requires more than strength. It requires the ability to consult, to create consensus and persuade the voters. This, Newman spectacularly failed to do. He persisted with a confrontational style and unpopular policies long after it was clear they did not have electoral support. The result was the defeat of the government and the Premier losing his own seat.'The Voter ID Experiment: Reform or the Continuation of a Queensland Tradition' by Tracey Arklay also looks at a Queensland issue set in a comparative perspective. She examines changes made to the electoral act by the Newman Government that required voters to bring identification to the polling booth. This occurred despite evidence from Canada and the United States that requiring voter ID impacts disproportionately on young voters, indigenous voters, elderly and remote voters. This legislation was particularly contentious in Queensland where there has been a history of distorting the electoral rules in ways that benefited the government of the day with dubious rationalisations. The justification for introducing voter ID requirements was to reduce fraudulent voting, but little evidence has been produced to indicate this is a serious problem in Australia. The voting groups expected to be most affected were more likely to be ALP or Green voters, which aroused suspicion of the government's motives. The change was implemented despite vocal opposition and was used at two elections. As Arklay notes, evidence from the 2015 state election appears to substantiate the experience of other jurisdictions on its impact on voter turnout. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».