Russia between East and West: Russian Foreign Policy on the Threshold of the New Millennium
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gabriel Gorodetsky, ed., Russia Between East and West: Russian Foreign Policy on the Threshold of the New Millennium. Cummings Center Series 18. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2003. xxii, 202 pp. $26.50, paper.For the student of Russian foreign policy, an initial glance through the table of contents of Gabriel Gorodetsky's edited volume, Russia Between East and West, is cause for eager anticipation. The list of contributors to this collection of perspectives on Russian foreign is striking; the book serves as an impressive who's who of Russian foreign scholars, notably including Margot Light, Richard Sakwa, Alex Pravda, and Neil MacFarlane. Upon completion of the book, the reader is left with a solid, albeit general, overview of Russian toward various countries and regions, each of which was undoubtedly selected for its strategic importance to post-Soviet Russia.The book's introduction pledges an elucidation of the mechanism of Russian foreign in its transition period, facilitated by a comparative study of continuity and change, both of which are themes visible in Russian foreign policy. Although the book does not fully deliver on the first half of this promise, it does offer the newcomer an excellent introduction to the study of Russian foreign policy. What becomes evident upon reviewing the compilation is that certain themes do indeed present themselves. Taken together, the contributions reveal the palpable continuity between Soviet and post-Soviet Russian foreign policy. Gorodetsky articulates this best when he writes: Notions of space and geopolitics, applied to conflicts concerning overlapping interests or regional ethnic issues and manipulated through the instruments of balance of power politics, seem to remain the modus operandi for the execution of Russian foreign policy (p. xxii).At the same time, the contributions aptly convey the truly multi-dimensional foreign agenda in Russia and its emphasis on multilateralism. In his desire to illuminate this multi-faceted foreign agenda, the editor has endeavoured to go beyond the oftemphasized relationship between Russia and the United States (symbolized by the book's cover), to reflect upon the many other components of the Russian foreign agenda. This is a noteworthy goal; however, what each chapter reveals is that Russia's relationship with the United States inevitably and repeatedly shapes its relations with the rest of the world. This is a function of a number of factors, not least of which, according to Bobo Lo, Neil MacFarlane and Pavel Baev, is President Putin's predisposition to allow hard security issues to dominate the foreign agenda. As Richard Sakwa notes, Vladimir Putin is a realist in the sense that he is inclined to privilege military and security matters. This, in combination with a degree of lingering Cold-War thinking, precipitated in part by the encroaching presence of NATO in Eastern Europe, necessarily means that the spectre of American power, as the only remaining superpower and self-proclaimed victor of the Cold War, hangs profoundly over the Russian foreign community. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».