Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This special edition of International Journal is presented in honour of Robert Spencer who, for a quarter of a century, was a professor at the University of Toronto. It is devoted to a wide-ranging discussion of Germany, Canada, and Canada-Germany relations, topics that were central to Spencer's scholarly work. This is also a very timely issue for two reasons: first, was president of both the EU and G 8 in 2007 and several contributors discuss what implications these responsibilities have had for transatlantic and, specifically, Canada-Germany relations; and second, it comes at a time when Canada has witnessed something of a Germany obsession (see Markus Kaim's contribution) over Afghanistan.The two countries may have arrived at a crossroads, as each seems to realize that the other is simply a good friend pursuing its own specific interests, neither more nor less. Of course, as some of the contributions argue, such reflect domestic pressures and have emerged over time. Nevertheless, in each country there appears to be some disillusionment about the other's foreign policy initiatives and general directions, whether it is Canadians looking at Germany's Afghanistan policy or Germans looking at Canada's Arctic policy. Is there a growing perception that we can no longer take as given the transatlantic solidarity and common values that characterized assumptions about each other's foreign policy agenda and that made Canada-Germany special?Or, if we look at the current situation from a more historical perspective, are we simply passing through a phase? Today's public feelings of Germany. ..letting down the side, and Canada in particular and lapses of solidarity1 are mirrored in earlier Canadian-German dissonances, for example in the late 19603, when Prime Minister Trudeau contemplated the complete withdrawal of Canada's NATO troops from and then announced their reduction in 1969. In those years, it was the Germans who felt that Canada was letting down the side, and in particular. Then, as now, the existence of shared security interests and values was questioned. In the end, a Canadian-German rapprochement symbolized by the Mannerfreundschaft (friendship between men) between the two leaders, Trudeau and Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, helped weather the storm. In fact, descriptions of the transatlantic community as Schicksalsgemeinschaft (community of fate) and Wertegemeinschaft (community of values) have been challenged ever since they were espoused. Undeniably, current Canada-Germany find themselves at a critical junction but, as most authors in this issue would agree, the relationship is a very durable one.Many things have changed since the Schmidt-Trudeau friendship. Both countries have become integral parts of regional arrangements, which directly affects their room for maneuver in specific foreign policy fields. This is more so the case for Germany, which is increasingly bound by EU common policies. itself often champions European approaches over national Sonderwege (special paths), as it often considers the European path to be in its best national interest. Acknowledging the importance of such regional structures and the internationalization of formerly domestic policy fields, we conceptualize relations broadly. The articles in this issue transcend the national/ internation al dichotomy and also go beyond bilateral as traditionally defined. Canada and are often not simply linked through political bilateral relations, but also, indirectly, through a third dimension. That is, Canadian-German political consist of finding common - or at least complementary - policies on global issues and trying to avoid working at cross-purposes. It also means that both countries often deal with each other in regionally or internationally mediated ways; linkages exist via institutions such as the EU, NAFTA, NATO, UN, G8 or transatlantic forums. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,020 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,087 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».