MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2201025148

Global Mining at the Edge of Transformation

2015· article· en· W2201025148 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dan Headrick

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch-Technology Management · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMining Techniques and Economics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)BoomBustAnalyticsBusinessProductivityInformation technologyCommodityEngineeringIndustrial organizationEconomyEconomicsComputer scienceFinanceEconomic growthData science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Early this year, mining giant Rio Tinto opened a new data center in Pune, India, to analyze massive volumes of information gathered from sensors attached to equipment operating at its mines around the world. Rio Tinto's Analytics Excellence Centre was established to predict and prevent downtime and improve safety and productivity. It's an industry first--mining has been pretty much last in adopting such business practices--but it could be the beginning of a sorely needed transformation. The center is unique in applying sophisticated data management technology, but also because it manages multiple, remote operations from a central location--mining has been, traditionally, a local art. If it is successful, the center and other recent innovations like it could help alter the fortunes of an industry in crisis. is a volatile business at any time, subject to boom-or-bust cycles and the vagaries of nature, local politics, and commodity markets. But 2014 was a particularly bad year in a string of them, and 2015 looks bleak as well. Gold prices are at a four-year low. Iron ore plummeted to double-digit territory in May 2015 and is forecast to hit an all-time low of $70 a ton in 2017. The world's biggest steel consumer, China, is pulling back on orders as its economy slows. Many mining companies have canceled projects or folded altogether. In this context, the world's largest mining companies are fighting to survive and stay competitive. Some companies have invested in critical new automation and drilling technology that promises to improve production and reduce costs, but a growing chorus of industry leaders argues that more fundamental change is needed--companies must change from within. Business models and processes must be streamlined to eliminate waste, smooth out the peaks and valleys of production, reduce accidents, protect the environment, and provide flexibility to respond to the unforeseen. The industry's future, these leaders say, depends not so much on where the next big ore deposit is discovered, but on how well mining companies coordinate dynamic information across complex operations. Emilie Ditton, a mining industry consultant and head of Asia Pacific Energy Insights at International Data Corporation (IDC), spends much of her time identifying ways to get operational silos inside mining companies to talk with each other. Mining companies are very sophisticated within their operational silos, she said. They do everything from optimizing truck performance to minimizing fuel costs and conveyor belt material handling efficiency. But if a production operation meets its goals and delivers product to a processing operation that can't handle all of the material coming in, the ultimate production outcomes are not improved. companies have assets, technology, and access to data, Ditton said. What they require is an enterprise-level data Far more than new technology, she said, mines need organizational investment in data interpretation as a business strategy. But, she admits, it takes strong leadership to take a risk on a new idea. We don't yet have a convincing story to tell on why we would take that risk, she said. That might be changing, however. We're in the early stages of a paradigm shift in mining, said Mike MacFarlane, a Canadian engineer and industry consultant, and retired executive vice president of AngloGold Ashanti, one of the world's largest mining companies. There are lots of clues around. Start with technology and innovation. In the United States, the auto industry in the 1940s and '50s had no peers; in the '60s and '70s, no peers. In the '80s, little Japanese cars changed everything. GM went to Japan and copied Toyota's lean manufacturing process. I would say the mining industry, in the little Japanese car analogy, is in the mid-80s. Indeed, the metaphor holds in the particulars, too, as mining companies are beginning to look at lean manufacturing for ways to streamline their own operations. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,143

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,009
Communication savante0,0130,013
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0430,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,074
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch-Technology ManagementMême sujetMining Techniques and EconomicsTravaux en français237 207