Book Review: Teaching against Islamophobia, Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom, Cultural-Historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development: Learning Teaching
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book represents a committed and comprehensive attempt to remind those in society who define themselves as educators that embracing issues of social justice and equity implies taking sides in the Islamophobia debate.The editors rightfully view Islamophobia through the lens of racism.In the United Kingdom, this has led to the use of the term 'anti-Muslim racism' instead of Islamophobia.Though the editors claim in their foreword that the book is aimed at teachers, the contributions make it clear that it is intended for a much broader audience and that it has been especially written to make all of us (and non-Muslims primarily) reflect on our attitudes and misconceptions and to rethink many of our assumptions.The 20 chapters in this book cover a wide range of topics, and it moves from more theoretical and socio-political discourse to a discussion of more practical issues.In chapter 1, Kincheloe & Steinberg set the theoretical tone for the rest of the book.Their comment that 'learning from difference means that teachers are aware of the histories and struggles of colonized groups and oppressed peoples' (p.4) signifies how the authors reject the very common approach in multicultural and intercultural education that avoids discussing historical injustices and controversial issues so as not to upset people.Their statement, which they build on in their further analysis, echoes Paul Gorski's challenge to 'decolonize' intercultural education when attempting to deal with education about diversity (Gorski, 2008).References to empathetic understanding, solidarity and valuing of differences help position their pedagogical approach.Very useful in this chapter is the deconstruction of the propagandistic arguments being used by, for instance, the Fordham Foundation to promote the West and especially the (Christian) United States as enlightened and majority Muslim nations as inherently inferior and a threat.Part 2 of the book is entitled 'Reading Islamophobia' and contains four chapters that look at public, media and political discourse.Shirley Steinberg returns to the topic of media discourse.In this fifth chapter, she first examines 17 films where there is a significant presence of Arabs and/or Muslims.Her analysis shows that without exception, the overwhelming majority of Muslims/Arabs depicted in films -for most films the two are interchangeable categories -are viewed as barbaric, dangerous and uncivilized.Steinberg also deconstructs popular television programmes such as cable television's Sleeper Cell and 24 (she mentions that 24 is Dick Cheney's favourite programme).On the whole, Muslims are perceived as potential threats and especially as the 'enemy within'.Given their evil demeanour and the threat to the United States, they do not deserve the same rights as others in society.The author closes with the interesting observation that '[t]his Hollywood diet is not innocent: It is constructed on obsession, stereotype, fear, and, more importantly, on what sells' (p.96).Chapters 9, 10 and 13 examine a topic often forgotten in the discourse about Islam and Muslims in the United States -the relationship of the African American community to Islam.Preacher Moss, who refers to himself as an 'undercover Muslim', takes a somewhat tongue-in-cheek look at African American perspectives on Muslim identities.The more serious essence of his treatise is that 'African American Muslims are marginalized as African Americans and ignored as African American Muslims ' (p.163).Samaa Abdurraqib provides, in her chapter, highly insightful
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle