MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W220139641

Changing Lives, Making the Difference: The 21st Century Public Library

2003· article· en· W220139641 sur OpenAlex
Alan Bundy

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAustralasian public libraries and information services · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLibrary Science and Administration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDemocracyPublic relationsProsperitySociologyLocal governmentPublishingPublic administrationState (computer science)Government (linguistics)ConstructiveValue (mathematics)Freedom of informationPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From a slow start in the middle of the 20th century Australia now has one of the most accessible and heavily used public library networks in the world. Those libraries are by far the most heavily used and appreciated community provision by local and state governments. There is increasing research demonstrating the qualitative as well as the quantitative value of the libraries and their potential as the focus for learning cities or communities. However much needs to be done in the 21st century, mainly by local government, to address issues such as poorly located, crowded and unattractive buildings, poor hours of opening, limited book and other resources, technology constraints and lack of specialist librarians. Because many councils still do not have library advisory committees with community representation, Friends of Library groups need to consider how they should represent library users to councils and state governments. Version of a paper delivered at the annual general meeting of the Friends of Mitcham Library Services Adelaide 31 July 2002 ********** The Unesco Public library manifesto 1994: a living force asserts that Freedom, prosperity and the development of society and of individuals are fundamental human values. They will only be attained through the ability of well informed citizens to exercise their democratic rights and to play an active role in society. Constructive participation and the development of democracy depend on satisfactory education as well as on free and unlimited access to knowledge, thought, culture and information. The public library, the local gateway to knowledge, provides a basic condition for lifelong learning, independent decision making and cultural development of the individual and social groups. This Manifesto proclaims Unesco's belief in the public library as a living force for education, culture and information, and as an essential agent for the fostering of peace and spiritual welfare through the minds of men and women. Unesco therefore encourages national and local governments to support and actively engage in the development of public libraries. It was with a similar sense that free access to public libraries and what they provide is a right, not a privilege, that Andrew Carnegie observed in 1904 as justification for his funding of public library buildings in the US, Canada, UK, Australia and elsewhere If it is right that schools should be maintained by the whole community for the well being of the whole, it is right also that libraries should be so maintained. Earlier than that, since the mid 1850s in the US and UK the public library was seen primarily as a centre for learning for the working classes. This was not a new idea but another manifestation of a 15th century idea that promoted literacy and independent education through `community profit libraries'. In the UK the background to the Public Libraries Bill was the call for opportunities to be freely available to working people, to go beyond the subscription based libraries of the mechanics' institutes, the first of which opened in Glasgow in 1823. A major reason for the Public Libraries Bill was the establishment of similar institutes in other European countries, notably Belgium. There was a concern that the UK would fall behind in the skills of its workers. That bill became law in 1850 and enabled councils to add one penny in the pound to rates to pay for public libraries. Those who paid rates--the wealthier--paid for the education and enlightenment of poorer citizens. Although there was a slow take up of this provision because councils and ratepayers resented it, the 19th century in both the UK and US saw the development of free local libraries, libraries which during the 20th century evolved from being primarily learning agencies for the working classes, to the multifaceted places they are today. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesCommunication savante
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,931
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0090,049
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle