MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2203490118 · doi:10.1177/002070200906400118

The Golden Age

2009· article· en· W2203490118 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Chapnick

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAncient historyDemographyPolitical scienceHistorySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We have under-rated Canada's quality in the past.... believe that the strength and wisdom of her contribution in international discussions and actions after the war will likewise surprise us. The fact is that Canada 'grown up' in the last few years, despite all her internal difficulties; she found herself. Some of her Ministers have marked ability. There is also in Ottawa a group of high officials who are still comparatively young - mostly in their early or mid forties - and whose influence over Canadian policy is and will continue to be at least as important as that of Ministers, whose tenure of office is more precarious. They are the heads of Government Departments and other official bodies. They are able, enlightened and forceful. If we do not discourage them, but on the contrary encourage them as well as their Ministers to be our colleagues in affairs, we shall find them good allies.1In 2OO3's While Canada Slept: How We Lost Our Place in the World, author Andrew Cohen bemoaned the decline of a once-great nation. During what he described as the of foreign policy (the 19405 and 19505), Canada punched above its weight in global affairs and received remarkable international recognition for doing so. Having entered the 2 ist century, Ottawa had lost its focus, and commitment, to the world around it.The deliberately provocative book - which included a series of policy prescriptions aimed at reinvig orating Canada's global presence - was largely well received, making the one prominent critical review all the more notable. Political scientist Don Munton disputed the extent of Canada's supposed decline vigorously, noting that the was, in relative and quantifiable terms, not as lustrous as While Canada Slepthad claimed. Cohen responded, and Munton issued a further rebuttal that offered insight into the basis of their passionate disagreement: I suspect that what some observers find remarkable about the 'Golden Age,' he wrote, has less to do with the resources and dollars and more to do with the character and premises and ideals of the policies then pursued.2 The issue, it seems, was not just whether there had been a period of enlightenment, but what its existence would, or should, imply.The Cohen-Munton dialogue revisited a long-standing issue of contention in the writing and understanding of Canada's national history. The term age, first formally referred to in 1967 by the inaugural principal of York University's Glendon College, Escort Reid, (he originally called it both the golden age and the golden decade) typically been invoked rhetorically by scholars, journalists, and policy practitioners in efforts to challenge Canadians to reinvest and reengage in world affairs. Its literal meaning evolved over time, as have its implications and related recommendations for action. Understanding the historiography of the is crucial to making sense of the divergences and discrepancies that have emerged over the last 40 years. If restoring the aura of the 19405 and 19505 is indeed a long-standing national aspiration, and not all of the evidence suggests that it is or even should be, Canada will be faced with a number of significant challenges. Not all of them are within the government's control, nor are they all politically appealing.To summarize, during the age, international circumstances, the domestic political environment, and popular attitudes at home were all compatible with the pursuit of a Canadian foreign policy that served a widely accepted definition of the national interest to an unprecedented, exceptional (and likely unrepeatable) extent.3 Public support for engaged internationalism - the decline of which been lamented repeatedly by national commentators - was certainly a factor, but paradoxically, the era was also profoundly elitist in spirit: Canadians were relatively passive supporters of their government's worldly activities. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,434
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,873

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0290,015
Communication savante0,0210,010
Science ouverte0,0020,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0880,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations54
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207