MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2203930612

집합동산담보의 활성화에 관한 입법론적 고찰

2011· article· ko· W2203930612 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue한양법학 · 2011
Typearticle
Langueko
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSecurity interestEconomic securityBusinessSecurity through obscurityLawLaw and economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsCloud computing securityFinanceSecurity information and event management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Many Countries including USA, Canada and Australia which undergoes the influence of British’s law system have been enforcing “The Floating Security System”. Otherwise “The Security of Inventory” has been recognized by theory or precedent in Germany and Japan. By the socio-economic needs in accordance with the development of capitalism in our country Korea recently, inventory is treated as one object in the law practice conventionally. Therefore, what is at issue in current civil law system is how to treat the security of inventory as a security object. The security of inventory is not used widely because the imperfection of public notification so-called the agreement on possession undermines the stability of security and occurs the risks of double transfer or bona fide acquisition. From these reasons, we suggest that the plan which gives strong legal effects in chattel security and activates the security of inventory is to introduce a new public notification. Otherwise many countries and the international organizations are making an effort to devise new means of security for increase and expansion of the security value by request of the national and international economic activity and of the mobility of financial capital. The movement to unify the chattel security system internationally or to make security by public notification is enhancing actively, and also the effect of that has resulted in significant achievements. The change of chattel security is appearing with different direction from the property law or the law principle for the real rights of security in continental law system because the chattel security system tends to be composed with the contents of common chattel law or common security law. The most characteristic changes of chattel security are that the numerus clausus principle is weakened and the freedom of contract is being recognized. In continental law system the parties can not create real rights of security or change its contents arbitrarily, since the numerus clausus principle that the types and contents of security are determined by law is applied as a dominant principle. But in new real rights law of security the chattel securities are integrated into one security right, and its contents can be decided by both parties’ agreements freely. This is the characteristic of common property law that does recognize not the numerus clausus principle but the freedom of contract. Also in new chattel security law the specific principle which is another dominant principle of property law is not recognized. The specific principle is that since the real right is the general right, the specification should be known to the third party. To be known to the third party the rights should be notified by registration of real property or by occupation of chattel, so the specific principle needs to be kept in order to implement the public notification method. But in new chattel security system, one security right is to be set without distinction whether the specific chattel or the inventory, the existing assets or the assets which will acquire in future, and the chattel or the bond. The only needs to contract is the agreement with the scope of chattel and bond between parties. And the mortgaged bond is not distinguished whether the specific bond or the multiple bond, the existing bond or the bond which will issue in future. It is enough that the details of the scopes for the mortgaged chattel and bond are clarified in the security contracts. This new chattel security system is more concerned with the practice than the theory, and is more pragmatic and reasonable. For these reasons, international transaction or international financial institutions are alleging to take advantage of this system. In order to increase and expand the security values, many countries and international organizations are doing every efforts to seek a new security means used throughout the world. Our country legislated the security law of chattel and bond in June 10, 2010 in order to meet the trend of chattel security which is unifying internationally, to ensure the safety of transactions by allowing the notification of chattel which has a limit to use as security because of imperfection of the public notification method, and to provide the financing convenience of the small and medium enterprise and the self-employed through the activation of property flow. Furthermore to increase the effectiveness of the law for the chattel and bond security, the introduction of floating charge, which activates the corporate finance by regarding as one object and setting up one security right to the business assets like as the floating security of British and USA, the business pledge of France and the enterprise security of Japan, has to be investigated.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,953
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle