MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2204229239

From "The Third Voyage of Master Henry Hudson," by Robert Juet

2009· article· en· W2204229239 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Richter

Notice bibliographique

RevueEarly American studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNothingQuarter (Canadian coin)OfficerHistoryArt historyClassicsArtPhilosophyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Only a few fragments of Heniy Hudson's own journal of his 1609 voyage appear to survive, embedded in Johan de Laet's Nieuwe Wereldt, ofte Beschrijvinghe van West-Indien, first published in 1625. The fragments describe a pleasant country of very who were so devastated at prospect Hudson might be afraid of their bows, that, arrows, they broke them in pieces, and threw them into fire, etc.1 A more complicated tale appears in sole surviving complete source on voyage, originally published by Samuel Purchas in same year as de Laet's work. We know next to nothing about its author, Robert Juet, except he was an officer on Hudson's ship, de Halve Maen; that, less than two years after composing these words, he was among mutineers who set Hudson adrift to die in frozen northern waters; and subsequently he himself failed to make it back to Europe alive. The portion of Juet's text dealing directly with 1609 exploration of river now bears Hudson's name is reprinted here, J. Franklin Jameson's early twentieth-century edition.2According to de Laet, from all they could judge and learn, there had never been any ships or Christians in quarter before; so they were first to discover this river and ascend it so far.3 That statement was convenient those asserting a right of first discovery, but there is no way to confirm it. Whatever case, Native people of quarter were not first whom Hudson and his crew had met after their long voyage across North Atlantic, as they wandered down North American coast today's Nova Scotia to North Carolina and finally back to New York Harbor. According to Juet, Indians of Maine, seeming glad of our comming, had claimed that there were Gold, Silver, and Copper mynes hard by us; and French-men doe Trade with them. Confirming latter assertion were facts one of them spake some words oi and that, a few days later, crew espied two French shallops full of Countrey trading furs for red Cassockes, Knives, Hatchets, Copper, Kettles, Trevits, Beads, and other trifles.4Something about all this set Hudson's crew on edge. Keeping good watch feare of being betrayed by people, Europeans seized next canoe-load of Indians they saw, then set out in a Boat & Scute with twelve men and Muskets, and two stone Pieces or Murderers, and drave Salvages their Houses, and tooke spoyle of them, as they would have done of us.5 No further explanation violence seemed necessary, although a contemporary Dutch commentator admitted the crew behaved badly towards people of country, taking their property by force, out of which there arose quarrels among themselves.6 This was not, then, a happy ship exploring a pleasant country. Despite a more civil encounter near Cape Cod with a Native man brought on board de Halve Maen and offered food and drink before being sent back home with three or foure glasse Buttons,7 many of Hudson's men had concluded that, as Juet twice observes in this excerpt, they durst not trust Indians. These experiences make it unlikely John Colman, said to have been killed in a skirmish in upper New York Bay, was an innocent victim of an unprovoked attack. Hudson's feuding crew expected trouble, and they tended to find it.Whether or not varied Munsee-speaking inhabitants of New York Harbor and Hudson Valley had yet laid eyes on Europeans, they seem to have had clear ideas about what to expect. Some of those who lived near mouth of river had probably seen European ships on horizon or European people on their shores. Certainly all had heard tales of dangerous, hairy-faced newcomers who had been sailing these waters better part of a century, who had taught their language to Native people a few hundred miles away, and who, in persons of Samuel de Champlain and a small party of French harquebussers, had several weeks earlier fought alongside an Indian war party in what would later be thus known as Champlain Valley. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEarly American studiesMême sujetMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyTravaux en français237 207