Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citizens' movements in Korea have taken root largely in the late 1980s and the early 90s, during which time Korea became a liberal and democratic state having toppled the military regime that ruled the country for a quarter of a century. In the process, citizens' movements began to advocate diverse causes and suddenly became a formidable social force. It is natural that much attention has been paid to the citizens' movements, their activities and organizations. Yet, the organizations' paid staff has received virtually no attention. This paper, part of a two-year study designed to investigate the habits and behavioral patterns of Korean people, examines the full-time staff working for citizens' movements and explores some of the common features of their everyday life, with particular attention paid to their values and attitudes. To that end, the author devised semi-structured questions to encourage them to respond in their own words about their work, lives, experiences and hopes. Twenty of the fifty or so of the staff of Green Korea Ullited(GKU) were interviewed in depth. This article reviews their reflections on, and aspirations about themselves and their movement. This study first looks at their backgrounds and their experiences before they joined GKU. Then, it considers their efforts to realize ecological alternatives to the received processes of pursuing material gain. Finally, it deals with the way by which they form and maintain collective self-identity. They work as realistic citizens in the sense that they believe their fight is worth fighting, even though it may be difficult. The article concludes by paying heed to the tension between their aspirations for post-material alternatives and their own organization's need for material resources from the outside. The staff may have to seek to find personal reward from within the bounds of the movement's organization, much like finding a green spot in smoggy urban areas.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».