[Postoperative compressive spinal epidural hematomas. 15 cases and a review of the literature].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: In the literature, the frequency of postoperative compressive spinal epidural hematomas (SEH) appearing very low, we conducted the present study to determine the frequency of this complication in their unit and look for causative and predisposing factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among the 1,487 spinal operations performed in our unit between September 1997 and August 1998, fifteen patients had postoperative compressive SEH; their files were retrospectively analyzed regarding the initial intervention, postoperative period, revision operation and neurologic follow-up. RESULTS: Five women and ten men were involved ranging in age from 47 to 70 years (average, 59.5 years). The primary intervention concerned the cervical spine in one case, the thoracic spine in seven and the lumbar spine in seven. Ten of the fifteen cases including all seven of the thoracic SEH (performed for compressive metastatic epiduritis) involved a laminectomy. A stenotic canal was the indication for the primary intervention in six of the seven lumbar cases. The average delay before onset of symptoms was 1.5 hours, 3.7 hours, and 5.3 hours after the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar interventions, respectively. The clinical pattern began with segmental pain rapidly followed first by bilateral radicular sensory deficit, then unilateral or bilateral motor deficit, except in the patients with thoracic SEH in whom segmental pain was followed by signs of cord impingement. Excluding the four cases in which diagnosis was retarded by work-up examinations (3 cases) or a misleading picture (1 case), revision surgery was performed from 1.25 to 4 hours after onset of symptoms (average, 2.75 hours). In the patients for whom reoperation was delayed, SEH resulted in permanent complete paralysis or sphincter dysfunction. In contrast, eight of the ten patients who were reoperated within four hours of the onset of symptoms either recovered completely or recovered their former neurologic status. DISCUSSION: Compressive SEH after spinal surgery is rare, only 41 cases having been reported aside from the series of Deburge et al. In the literature, the frequency is around 1 to 2 for 1000 operations for some authors, as opposed to 3 p. 100 and 6 p. 100 found by two other groups. The 1 p. 100 of the present series is close to the latter values. Nonetheless, it is probably important to take the type of surgery into account, as shown by the current series in which SEH occurred after 5.9 p. 100 of the operations for metastasis, but only once out of 304 anterior cervical interventions. To reduce the risk as much as possible, it is important to be aware of the factors that may contribute to this complication. Several recommendations concerning prevention of SEH are thus discussed. Once SEH has occurred, the only modifiable prognostic factor appears to be the delay before reintervention. CONCLUSION: Although postoperative SEH is relatively rare, it may have dramatic consequences. In our opinion, reintervention must be performed as soon as possible after the onset of neurologic deficit, the work-up investigations only prolonging the critical surgical delay, which is probably the only alterable prognostic factor.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».