Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research study included 12 women - six who were in the process of obtaining their degree and six who had obtained their degree, for at least 10 years, from the same mid-sized Canadian university. All of the women were at least 30 years of age at the commencement of their program. This research study utilized qualitative interviews and examined the lived experiences of these 12 mature women for their experiences, barriers, and supports they encountered while obtaining their first undergraduate degree. The epistemological perspective, theoretical perspective, and methodology utilized were constructivism, feminism, and Charmaz’s constructivist grounded theory, respectively. The women identified both the barriers and the supports they experienced while in the process of obtaining their degrees. Some barriers they identified include multiple role strain, sexism, poverty, ineffective teaching methods, marginalization, health issues, circuitous paths to education, nonsupport for their specific needs, and programs that were not designed for the mature student along with uncertainty of how their programs might benefit them in the future. However, the women also identified male mentors as effective and supportive to their learning, which counters research examined that stated women learn more effectively from women mentors. The women also identified peers, family, and friend supports as important supports in their educational success. Other supports that were identified included receiving assistance for children, while the women attended to homework or classwork; assistance with more concrete chores (i.e., housework, groceries, editing papers); and supportive comments. Some of the women identified that a smaller campus environment supported them because they felt like they belonged and were a part of a family. These women identified the smaller campus as a major factor in their educational success. Workplace supports included flexible time off, financial assistance, and encouragement, these factors were also identified as major factors that assisted the women in their educational success. The women began their university program, either through self or other (i.e., friend, family member) guidance, to further develop as a person. The overarching goal, for the women, was that they wanted to “Make a Difference” in their lives and/or the lives of others. “Making a Difference” is the overarching, theme of this research, and it was this that kept the women motivated to continue through their degree program. A graphic model illustrates the women’s journey to their destination of “Making a Difference” through achieving their degree.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».