Relational and Cultural Impacts on the Work Life of Young Indigenous Men/ Impacts Relationnels et Culturels Sur la Vie Au Travail De Jeunes Hommes Autochtones
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Employment success and educational attainment are significant issues for the Indigenous1 population of Canada. Statistics Canada figures show that, in the 15-to-24-year-old category, unemployment rates are two to three times higher for Aboriginal people when compared to their non-Aboriginal counterparts, and Aboriginal men face exceptional hardships in the workforce (Statistics Canada, 2006, 2011). Additionally, educational completion rates for Aboriginal people are lower at both the high school and postsecondary levels when compared to the general population (Statistics Canada, 2011). Despite this, Indigenous populations are underrepresented in educational and vocational psychology research and literature, and there is limited understanding of the issues that relate to their career and academic development (Juntunen et al., 2001; Turner et al., 2006). Hoffmann, Jackson, and Smith (2005) state that they are particularly concerned with career development for Native American males, and therefore urge researchers to further explore this area. These concerns have not gone completely unattended; there is a growing body of literature that highlights the numerous strengths and challenges of Indigenous people in Canada (Coverdale, 2011; Merrill, Bruce, & Marlin, 2010).The present article describes our research that explored the supports, challenges, and obstacles that young Indigenous men experienced through their work life pursuits. We begin with our theoretical framework, which draws from relational theory and social constructionist approaches. Following this, we present a brief overview of the demographics and literature related to our topic. We then describe our qualitative study and discuss metathemes and themes identified in the analysis of interviews with eight young Indigenous men.RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKRelational perspectives serve as a metaframework for numerous theories and ways of understanding (Blustein, Schultheiss, & Flum, 2004; Schultheiss, 2007). The framework posits that relationships are central to human functioning, and that interpersonal and intrapersonal struggles reflect natural human strivings for connection, affirmation, support, attachment, and mattering (Schultheiss, 2007). Relationships are part of every person's life; a sense of well-being and safety develops through building and maintaining positive connections (Jordan, 2008). Blustein (2011) noted that people learn about themselves and the world around them through relationships, that there is a sizable overlap between relationships and work, and that work is an inherently relational act embedded in external and internal relational contexts. Individuals are rooted in family, social, and cultural relational contexts; understanding these contexts is necessary for learning about how plans for work are created and implemented (Schultheiss, 2007). Schultheiss put forward four tenets for understanding career development from a relational perspective:(a) the influence of the family as critical to understanding the complexities of vocational development, (b) the psychological experience of work as embedded within relational contexts (e.g., social, familial, and cultural), (c) the interface of work and family life, and (d) relational discourse as a challenge to the cultural script of individualism, (p. 192)Blustein et al. (2004) argued that understanding the connection between interpersonal relationships and the career and work world is necessary for understanding individual and community career concerns. A relational perspective of careers provides a framework for understanding how people comprehend, construct, and act in response to the contemporary working landscape (Blustein et al., 2004). The authors argued that getting closer to individuals' experiences as they reflect on their work and careers provides a deeper understanding of the connection between relationships and work. Further, they suggested that the goal of the relational perspective of careers would be to construct generative discourses that challenge existing traditions of knowledge and suggest new possibilities for practice and policy (Blustein et al. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».