MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2208141884

Children Sleeping Habits in Preschool Age, Their Behavior during the Wake Up Night and Strategies Adopted by Parents

2016· article· en· W2208141884 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge Manuel Amado Apóstolo

Notice bibliographique

RevuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild Therapy and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyWakeDevelopmental psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction\n\nSleep is a psychobiological need that requires a completely satisfaction. The sleep-wake fluctuation allows for cell recovery in its protective function and maintenance of homeostasis, regulating the functions of the brain and the body in general. Vyazovskiy and Harris (2013, p 450-451) suggested that " a key function of NREM sleep is to allow individual neurons to experience a substantial lowering of synaptic and metabolic activity, preventing cellular damage and favouring processes of cellular maintenance after sustained synaptic activity during waking. Because of the extensive recurrent circuitry of the cortex, this requires off periods of coordinated silence in a local population" and sustained also that the neurons restoration involve a state of functional sensory disconnection from the environment and behavioural immobility. Therefore, we need to be globally and behaviourally in order to rest the neurons.\nSo, the sleep is essential for a child´s health, wellbeing and development. The maturation of sleep in childhood requires evolution and adaptive, connected to multiple factors, like temperament, level of development, and socio-cultural environment of the family. \nNevertheless we can identify more and more sleep problems in childhood, associated with unhealthy habits. According to National Sleep Foundation, in 2004, surveys conducted by the NSF (1999-2004) revealed 69 percent of children experience one or more sleep problems a few nights or more during a week. The preschoolers most often stall about going to bed at bedtime (52%), resist going to bed at bedtime (30%), seem sleepy or overtired during the day (26%), snore (19%) and/or have difficulty waking in the morning (19%) at least a few days or nights a week.\nThe problematic night-waking occur frequently of preschool-aged children and are most often associated with poor parenting behaviors.\n\nObjectives\nAs part of broader research and with the awareness that the sleep habits of children are changing, not always in the right direction, and that sleep problems in early childhood are resultant from inefficient routines, we have defined this main objective:\nIdentify the sleep habits of children in pre-school age, including the daily duration of sleep, the practice of co-sleeping, the behaviors of preschool-aged children during night-waking and the strategies adopted by parents to help their child to sleep autonomously , as well as the factors that are associated with them.\n\nMethodology\nA quantitative, descriptive correlational study was developed in a sample by convenience of 158 parents/mothers of preschool-aged children. We have translated and validated culturally to Portuguese the CNBS and NSS, developed by Coulombe and Reid (2010). As well, we have selected the "Sleep Habits Inventory for Preschool Children developed and validated by Croewell and colleagues at the University of Maine - USA, in 1987, translated and validated for the Portuguese language (Batista & Nunes, 2006). It allows evaluating the changes in sleep habits in children from 2-6 years of age, in the week previous the data collection. It must be completed by parents\nResults\nOnly half of the children retained a routine time to go to bed and fell asleep in their own bed. The average sleep duration was of 9,62hours per night. However there are children in this age group who sleep an inadequate number of hours. This finding is is important The practice of "co-sleeping", were common, 65.2% slept alone in own room, while 14.0% usually shared a bed with at least one parent. It was also found that 10.1% slept with brothers; while 9.5% did in own bed in shared room; 7.6% slept with one of his parents; \nA little over half of the children (53,2%) called their parents during night-waking at least once a week, expressing comfort requests followed by those of escape, loss of control, activity and fear. The behaviors regularly adopted were "Asking parents to stay close to him" "asks for a hug, a caress on the back, a touch, etc." "Asks to stay in bed of parents" "get out of bed or crib and leave the room."\nAbout 25% screamed by parents from bed or the cradle and/or didn't sleep again without help. There were even more comfort requests followed the escape of the environment requests of sleep and behavior indicative of loss of control\nThe strategy most commonly used by parents to help their child to sleep autonomously was keeping bedtime routine, and in opposition to co-sleeping, this was the most associated to the decreasing in inadequate sleeping habits - IHSCP and to requests for escape.\nConclusions\nWhile indicating a duration of nocturnal sleep of children of preschool age (= 9.62 hours) similar to that obtained in other studies with children in this age group, we deduce that there is a significant number to sleep much less than what is required. This is problematic, because unhealthy habits will harm these children soon as they enter the school with other requirements. \nGiven the emergence of these sleep problems through the first childhood, it is a good practice in the infant health consultations to discuss and guide the parents to lead with this activity of life. The acquisition of appropriate sleeping habits should be approached with the same relevance of practice of physical exercise or eat healthily. In addition to the maintenance of the bedtime routine, it should be fostered the development of self-esteem/self-control, the settlement of limits and development of autonomy, instead of punishment strategies , the reinforcement of self-esteem/self-control and reward, that revealed the increase of some of the inappropriate behavior during night-waking.\nBibliografia\nBatista, B. & Nunes, M. L. (2006). Validação para a Língua Portuguesa de duas Escalas de Avaliação de Hábitos e Qualidade do Sono em Crianças. Journal of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology. 12 (3): 143-148.\nCoulombe, Aimee J. (2010). Parenting at midnight: measuring parents' thoughts and strategies to help young children sleep through the night. [Em linha]. Universidade de Western Ontario. [Consult. 2 de Fev. 2011]. Disponível em: <http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=etd>\n National Sleep Fundation. (2014) [Consult. 8 de dez. 2014]. Disponível em http://sleepfoundation.org/sites/default/files/FINAL%20SOF%202004.pdf\nVyazovskiy, Vladyslav V. & Harris, Kenneth D. (2013). Sleep and the single neuron: the role of global slow oscillations in individual cell rest. Nat Rev Neurosci. 14(6): 443-451.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,239
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,863

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Même sujetChild Therapy and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207