MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2208304134 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.5378.5378

Induction Therapy With Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) For Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia (pPCL)

2013· article· en· W2208304134 sur OpenAlexaff
Madeline Phillips, Christine I. Chen, Rodger E. Tiedemann, FRCPA, Suzanne Trudel, Esther Masih‐Khan, Víctor H. Jiménez‐Zepeda, Vishal Kukreti

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePlasma cell leukemiaBortezomibInternal medicineCyclophosphamideGastroenterologyDexamethasoneMedian follow-upPlasma cell dyscrasiaMelphalanMultiple myelomaSurgeryChemotherapyImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an uncommon, highly aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia with a poor prognosis.  A limited number of small retrospective studies have reported promising results in treating PCL using the novel agent bortezomib (btz).  We therefore undertook a retrospective study of our cohort of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed pPCL treated with cyclophosphamide, btz, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) as front-line therapy. Methods Between August 2008 and June 2013, 10 newly diagnosed pts with pPCL (≥20% PCs in peripheral blood and/or absolute PCs ≥ 2.0x109/L) were referred to Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.  Pts received a median of 4 (range 4-8) 28-day cycles of CyBorD induction consisting of weekly cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 po, weekly btz 1.5 mg/m2 IV or SQ, and dexamethasone in pulse fashion for cycles 1 and 2 and then weekly as well. Hematologic responses were assessed using IMWG consensus criteria for serological, and, if available, bone marrow, criteria. Survival times were measured from the time of first treatment. Results The median age was 54 yrs (range 45-68); 6 were male. Median (range) hemoglobin was 85 g/L (27-135), creatinine 212 umol/L (57-404), albumin 37g/L (25-47), LDH 215 U/L (163-537) and β2-microglobulin 441 nmol/L (295-1136); median WBC was 10.6 (4.8-32.2), ANC 2.0 (1.4-3.3), and platelet count 94 (36-159) x 109/L.  Abnormal cytogenetics were common; of 9 pts with FISH results available, 4 pts had deletion 13q (44.4%), 3 had deletion 17p (33.3%), 3 had t(14;16) (33.3%), 4 had t(11;14) (44.4%) and 2 had other changes (22.2%).  The overall response rate (ORR defined as ≥ PR) after CyBorD induction was 100% and included PR in 3 pts (33.3%), VGPR in 5 pts (50%), and CR in 2 pt (20%).  Nine pts underwent successful stem cell (SC) mobilization with cyclophosphamide + G-CSF (median CD 34+ cells 3.42 x 106/kg [range 2.16-7.31]); 1 pt, who has been given 8 cycles to date, is awaiting a second attempt at SC collection.  Two other patients relapsed after completion of planned induction while awaiting transplant; these required additional therapy to control the disease before ASCT. In total, 9 pts have undergone subsequent ASCT, including tandem ASCT in 4 pts. After ASCT, 1 pt received maintenance therapy with thalidomide, while 6 more recently treated pts were given lenalidomide maintenance. Best responses post-ASCT were as follows: ≥ PR in all 9 pts (100%, specifically PR in 1 (11.1%), VGPR in 4 (44.4%), and CR in 4 (44.4%, including 1 pt with nonsecretory disease in documented CR pre-ASCT who was not formally reassessed but clinically remained in CR after ASCT).  Five patients have relapsed post-ASCT with time to relapse from ASCT of 13.5 mos (range 3-38), including both pts who had progressed and required additional therapy before ASCT (time to relapse 3 and 4 months). The median PFS for all pts from the start of therapy was 18 mos (range 4-44 mos). Currently, 7 pts (70%) are alive after a median follow-up of 25 mos (range 8-58); 5 of these pts are alive without relapse after a median of 25 mos (range 8-28) while 2 pts (20%) are alive after ≥ 1 relapse at a median of 49 mos (range 39-58).  Three pts (30%) have died from disease a median of 20 mos (range 7-24) after commencing therapy. During CyBorD induction, 5 pts required hospitalization for a median of 10 days (range 6-53); heme toxicity was generally mild, with only 1 grade 4 neutropenia and no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included: mild peripheral neuropathy in 5 pts (50%) (grade 1 in 4; grade 2 in 1) in addition to grade 1 shingles (10%), grade 2 drug fever attributed to btz (10%), and anemia requiring transfusion (10%). Conclusions  Although compromised by the small sample size, our study suggests that induction with CyBorD for pts with pPCL produces a high initial ORR with a favorable toxicity profile.  However, disease progression is common in this entity and can occur early, while waiting for ASCT; these pts have a particularly poor outcome even after reinduction and subsequent ASCT. Although CyBorD is an effective initial regimen for patients with pPCL, innovative therapies will be needed to maintain long-term disease control. Disclosures: Reece: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy. Chen: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tiedemann: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Trudel: Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,486
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,746

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207