MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W221161003

US Army Europe: Deployment Training and Certification

2000· article· en· W221161003 sur OpenAlex
Robert J. Fulcher

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMilitary review · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMilitary and Defense Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCertificationActive dutySoftware deploymentTraining (meteorology)AeronauticsDutyPoliticsOperations managementOperations researchEngineeringManagementLawPolitical scienceMilitary personnelEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Military convoys no longer grind their way to or from the Grafenwoehr area in Germany. Guns no longer relentlessly pound Grafenwoehr impact areas 24 hours a day. Social, political, economic and environmental factors have eliminated yearly REFORGER exercises. The US Army is now largely based in the Continental United States (CONUS). However, as the Army's forward-deployed component, US Army Europe (USAREUR) is ideally suited to support the National Command Authority's strategy of shaping and engagement. USAREUR has become an innovator in the processes necessary to prepare a force for military operations other than war (MOOTW). Nowhere is that innovation as apparent as the plan used to prepare forces for duty in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the NATO-led mission in Bosnia. USAREUR/7th Army's (7A's) success in preparing forces for MOOTW missions results from the application of a simple, yet effective, six-step model adopted by follow-on forces in CONUS. Step 1. Training the force to fill mission essential task list (METL) proficiency. USAREUR/7A calls this step training the delta, and it does not relate directly to an impending MOOTW mission. The intent is to bring MOOTW-mission units to full METL proficiency in their conventional mission skills. The obvious question is why train a unit to a high state of readiness in skills not directly related to the upcoming mission? The answer is simple. There is no guarantee that tasked units will not be pulled from their MOOTW mission to respond to other, higher priority missions that would require proficiency in the skills normally ascribed to the units. The units might also have to transition to conventional military operations within the theater of employment. The time to pull units into neutral areas or the resources necessary to train them might not exist. For these reasons each unit must be capable of fulfilling its habitual assigned role. Obviously this step depends heavily on the most scarce resource in Army operations-time. Step 2. Form the team. MOOTW missions require a highly tailored team designed to be effective given the mission's unique requirements. The team USAREUR/7A formed to provide a possible response force in Zaire was different from the force sent to the Balkans as part of the NATO-led peacekeeping force. USAREUR/7A's team will often be a joint team and most certainly will have a combined component. Such a team will most likely comprise a mix of active and reserve forces, and it will be unique in its mix of mission and support personnel. Bringing the team together early in the process helps ensure mission success. Step 3. Assess mission-training requirements. To provide structure to the assessment, USAREUR/7A divides the assessment into three levels: individual skills, collective or unit skills and leader skills. Within the individual and collective categories, USAREUR/7A has further divided the analysis into general skills associated with the individual or unit and theater-specific skills unique to the mission or environment. The assessment is published in the annex of the theater campaign plan. Step 4. Training tasks identified in the assessment. Standards must first be developed. This is where the expertise found at the 7A's Training Command's Combat Maneuver Training Center (CMTC) was employed with great success. The observer-controller teams assigned to CMTC were ideally suited to develop and maintain the programs of instruction necessary to ensure standardization. To be effective, the first component of must be leader training. Leader is a full orientation to the mission and environment, gives key command and staff members in-depth knowledge of the mission and allows leaders to focus on follow-on training. People intimately aware of mission requirements and the environment conduct leader in seminar format. The first leaders' seminar was conducted at the Grafenwoehr area by USAREUR/7A staff: General Sir Michael Rose's experience leading the Canadian peacekeeping mission provided the necessary focus to leaders of the first USAREUR deploying forces. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,969
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle