MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2212336836

Surface Water Quality Modelling Considering Riparian Wetlands

2009· dissertation· en· W2212336836 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Wayne Jenkinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2009
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRiparian zoneWetlandWater qualityEnvironmental scienceSurface waterHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeographyGeologyEnvironmental engineeringEcologyGeotechnical engineeringBiologyHabitat
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Riparian wetlands are believed to play an important role in mitigating non-point source pol-
\nlution, acting as physical and biochemical buffers between diffuse pollution sources and receiving
\nwaters. Many studies examined riparian wetlands at the field scale, but there is a dearth of re-
\nsearch at the watershed scale, particularly in the region of Southern Ontario, where agricultural
\nland use predominates.
\nThis study examined the impacts of riparian wetlands on surface water quality at the water-
\nshed scale. A field study was conducted on two sub-watersheds at the northern headwaters of the
\nCanagagigue Creek within the Grand River Watershed in Southern Ontario. The two watersheds
\nwere similar in area and land use but with differing riparian wetland extent adjacent to the sub-
\nwatershed main channels. A two-year study was conducted examining the hydrology, hydraulics,
\nwater quality and nutrient fluxes from the two sub-basins. Water quality data were obtained at
\nthe outlet of each sub-basin during base-flow conditions and during 16 rainfall and snow melt
\nrunoff events. The hydrology was simulated using the WatFlood model and the water quality
\n(nitrate and total suspended solids) was simulated using an enhancedWatFlood/AGNPS model
\nthat was modified to account for continuous simulation, in-stream contaminant fate/transport
\nand riparian wetland influences.
\nThe hydraulics and hydrological characteristics of the two basins were distinct. The basin
\nwithout riparian wetland protection (“West Basin”) exhibited ephemeral tendencies, going dry
\nfor several months in the summer, whereas the basin with extensive riparian wetland protection
\n(“East Basin”) showed a persistent base-flow throughout the year with a consistently more rapid
\nhydrological response. This study showed higher nutrient concentrations including nitrate, total
\nnitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) in the West basin than the East basin, attributed
\nto the lack of riparian wetland protection in the West sub-basin. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
\nconcentration were higher in the east sub-basin than the west sub-basin attributed to differences
\nin sediment grain size distributions and differences in local stream bed slope. Constituent loading
\nestimates from the two sub-basins were conducted on an event-basis and on an average monthly
\nload basis. This study showed that during events most constituents (Nitrate, TP, and TSS) were
\ndischarged in greater quantities from the East sub-basin than the West sub-basin for both rainfall
\nand snowmelt events. Event-based TN loading was also higher for the East sub-basin but the
\ndifference was not statistically significant. Monthly average loading was significantly higher in
\nthe East sub-basin than the West sub-basin for Nitrate, TN and TSS. Monthly average loading was higher in the East basin than the West basin for TP as well, but the difference was not
\nstatistically significant. In spite of the generally higher nutrient concentrations in the West sub-
\nbasin, the east sub-basin exhibits higher loads due to the differing hydrological conditions in that
\nbasin. The persistent stream flow in the East basin continuously transports nutrients of a lower
\nconcentration than the West, but the consistent flow dominates the loading calculations resulting
\nin a greater constituent mass transported.
\nThe modelling of sediment and nitrogen loading was conducted over the study period. Sedi-
\nment modelling results showed that the dominant process in the model was in-channel transport
\nwith the calibrated model showing very little sensitivity to overland transport parameters and
\nriparian wetland retention. The ability to hydrologically model the basin accurately dictated the
\nperformance of the sediment transport model. Nitrogen modelling results demonstrated an ability
\nto generally simulate the nitrogen profiles trends during storm events. However, the WatFlood
\ngroundwater storage model provided limitations in terms matching the nutrient concentration
\nvariability observed in the measured data. The processes that dominated model performance
\nwere fertilizer loading and nitrogen mineralization coefficients, with the riparian wetlands playing
\na small role in nitrogen removal in the calibrated model.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,248
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentTravaux en français237 207