Jesuit Accounts of the Colonial Americas: Intercultural Transfers, Intellectual Disputes, and Textualities <i>Jesuit Accounts of the Colonial Americas: Intercultural Transfers, Intellectual Disputes, and Textualities</i> . Edited by M <scp>arc</scp> A <scp>ndré</scp> B <scp>ernier,</scp> C <scp>lorinda</scp> D <scp>onato,</scp> and H <scp>ans-</scp> J <scp>ürgen</scp> L <scp>üsebrink</scp> . (UCLA Clark Memorial Library Series.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014. x + 464 pp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reflecting the transnational reach of the Society of Jesus from the sixteenth century onwards, this collection surveys over two centuries of intensive Jesuit publication of letters, histories, and missionary accounts in the major European vernaculars and in Latin. The volume's contributors focus primarily on material in Spanish and French, and a division into three parts (‘Intercultural Transfers’, ‘Intellectual Disputes’, and ‘Textualities’) reflects the importance of the Society's textual output in the transfer of information about the Americas, and the mobility of Jesuit discourses that might even be marshalled in the service of nationalist debates. The title also hints at Protestant and Catholic resistances to the Jesuits' substantial influence, culminating in their expulsion from Spanish territories in 1767 — a pivotal date around which several of the articles turn. This collection is based on seminar proceedings, and there is some crossover of the material of at least four chapters with other studies undertaken by their authors (two of these were, however, originally written in languages other than English or French). Despite this, the book opens up an interesting range of interrogations on the diversity of responses to cultural difference. Explorations of Jesuit narrative and rhetorical strategies trace the evolution from an oral to a literate sacred rhetoric in the seventeenth century (Perla Pawling), or discuss oratory as the sign of the ‘optimistic anthropology’ of the Enlightenment (Marc André Bernier, p. 393). The ‘scientific’ value of Jesuit testimony to a Europe ‘[thirsty] for encyclopedic knowledge’ (p. 53) is discussed as proto-ethnology, following the work of Alfred Métraux, and the ‘anthropological’ as one of ‘various fragmentary discourses’ (Ute Fendler, p. 220). Indeed, certain contributors call for a reappraisal of the Enlightenment beyond ‘restrictive and Eurocentric definitions’ (Margaret Ewalt, p. 346) to encompass other ‘knowledge transfers’ from the Americas, in which the Jesuits were essential mediators (Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, p. 139). The studies that focus on strategies adopted by Catholic religious orders, when faced with unfamiliar Amerindian languages and cultures, explore an intriguing range of translation events that should be of interest to scholarship beyond French Studies. These interrogate the tactic of Jesuit adaptation through the ‘loss’ of an original identity and the transformation into a homo universalis, a step which ‘entailed a real intercultural transfer, between European culture and alien wisdoms and societies’ (Girolamo Imbruglia, pp. 32–33). Fendler's contribution characterizes the Jesuits as ‘mediators’, engaging in a process of ‘com[ing] and go[ing]’ between cultures (pp. 225, 239). Klaus-Dieter Ertler, in a study of the Jesuit Relations in French, analyses the tension between the empirical — the testimony of the Jesuit observer in situ — and the implementation of a narrative model informed by the Loyolan tradition. Lüsebrink's study of the changing fortunes of the comparative approach traces its evolution into an analytical tool conveying ‘une vision différentielle des sociétés et des cultures’ (p. 430). Overall, this volume is a stimulating introduction to the intense cultural production that was generated by the encounter of Catholicism with the Americas, by means of the supranational perspective that the study of early modern missionary orders and intellectual networks calls for.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,013 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».