MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2214642796

Teaching Counselling Theory and Skills: A Scoping Review of Canadian Graduate Counselling Psychology Coursework Enseignement théorique et technique du counseling : revue de la portée des cours universitaires canadiens de maîtrise en psychologie du counseling

2015· review· fr· W2214642796 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Greg Harris, Katie A. Flood

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2015
Typereview
Languefr
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCounseling Practices and Supervision
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCourseworkCertificationPsychologyMedical educationPopulationConsistency (knowledge bases)Counseling psychologyEducational psychologyPedagogyMedicinePsychotherapistPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Counselling psychology and counselling are critically important disciplines, each contributing greatly to Canadas population of professional psychologists and counsellors. Many of the country's preparation programs are located in universities at the graduate level, and tend to be within education faculties or departments. Graduates of these programs may have the option to seek certification as Certified Canadian Counsellors with the Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association (CCPA) and /or become Registered or Licensed Psychologists with their provincial/territorial psychology boards/colleges. Even though there are guidelines on practitioner competency expectations and there is a high degree of consistency in where such programs are located, we know relatively little about how courses in counselling and counselling psychology are actually structured at the university level. Very few publications exist in this area. This project was developed to explore introductory graduate-level counselling theory and skills courses in counselling and counselling psychology master's programs in Canada. This information provides a partial picture of how courses designed to teach counselling theory and skills are structured in Canada.Research on Counsellor TrainingVarious training programs (e.g., Carkhuff, 1969; Cohen, 2004; Cormier, Nurius, & Osborn, 2012; Hill, Stahl, & Roffman, 2007; Ivey, 1971; Kagan, 1984; Urbani, Smith, Maddux, & Crews, 2002) have been developed for instruction in microskills and basic counselling skills. Such training is often at the prepracticum or preinternship level and occurs at the earlier stages of counsellor preparation. Early research has supported elements of skills training approaches (see Hill & Lent, 2006, for reviews), but researchers have noted some methodological issues with research design in this area of research (e.g., Evans, 2011; Hill & Lent, 2006). Evans (2011) conducted a meta-analysis of 33 published studies on counselling skill training. This research found a small effect size and noted that the type of skills curricula had no impact on outcome for master's-level counsellor trainees. They also found that trainees who practiced skills with volunteer clients demonstrated greater improvement in skills versus trainees who role-played with other trainees. Some researchers have suggested that specific counsellor training models (e.g., skilled counsellor training model) can result in greater gains by trainees in skill development and even counselling self-efficacy compared to those not receiving such preparation (Urbani et ah, 2002). Regardless of curricula approach, Carkhuff (1987) noted that core microskills (e.g., attending, facilitating) are critical and serve as the foundation for more advanced skills. Many counselling preparation programs include didactic instruction on counselling and communication microskills and have opportunities for students to practice such skills under supervision (Trepal, Haberstroh, Duffey, & Evans, 2007). Related to skills training, Keats (2009) highlighted several advantages of using video demonstrations in counsellor preparation and discussed several key considerations in utilizing such video demonstrations in teaching counselling (e.g., video selection, student preparation to view the video) (see Keats, 2009, for a review).Research (e.g., Heppner & Claiborn, 1989; Heppner & Dixon, 1981) has suggested that key counsellor skills and abilities can be enhanced by training. There has been a range of studies and opinions put forward regarding what are important skills and personal characteristics/attributes for counsellors and psychotherapists. Authors (e.g., Bedi et ah, 2011; Trepal et ah, 2007) have noted that understanding and being able to develop a therapeutic or working relationship is a core condition of counselling. Indeed, Carl Rogers (1957) talked about the core conditions of counselling, whereby a counsellor should be able to provide accurate empathy, unconditional positive regard, and genuine- ness. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,064
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,633
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0640,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,374
Écart entre enseignants0,333 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapyMême sujetCounseling Practices and SupervisionTravaux en français237 207