MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W221466868

The Postanarchist Moment

2012· article· en· W221466868 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathan Fretwell

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnarchist studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAnarchism and Radical Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVampirePoliticsSociologyPublishingReflexivityArt historyMedia studiesLawHistoryLiteratureArtPolitical scienceSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

THE POSTANARCHIST MOMENTSaul Newman, The Politics of Postanarchism Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010, 200 pp.; ISBN: 978-0-7486-3496-5Duane Rousselle and Siireyyya Evren (eds), Post-Anarchism: A Reader London & New York: Pluto Press/ Black Point & Winnipeg: Femwood Publishing, 201 1 , 268 pp.; ISBN: 978-1-55266-433-9Taken together, the two works under consideration here represent what might be regarded as postanarchism's coming of age. Having burst into life in the Noughties with all the verve and energy of youth, it is a more measured form of postanarchism that stands before us today. A reflexive, more confident postanarchism, one assured of its own status within radical political thought. Indeed, such has been its influence in some quarters that Lewis Call, in his contribution to the edited collection ('BufFy the Post- Anarchist Vampire Slayer'), is compelled to declare that 'a kind of postanarchist moment has arrived' (p. 183). A moment, if these two works are anything to judge by, which shows litde sign of abating. Pausing to take stock, these works focus not on staking out the philosophical terrain on which anarchism and poststructuralism meet, as in earlier texts, but on assessing postanarchism's impact and import. And in this respect they count amongst the most interesting and important works yet to have emerged out of the postanarchist milieu.The development that postanarchism has undergone in recent years is no more clearly in evidence than in die basic shift in tenor between Saul Newman's original foray into postanarchism, From Bokunin to Locan (2001), and his latest extended treatment of the subject, The Politics of Postanarchism. Although die rubric 'postanarchism' (now generally accepted as a shorthand for all the various, often competing, strands of poststructuralist/postmodernist inspired anarchism) received its initial airing in the former work, in reality we find that the term itself plays therein a rather muted, marginal role, despite the prominence afforded to it in the tide of the closing chapter. By the turn of the decade, however, much has changed, with 'postanarchism' now taking centre-stage, being proffered as an independent body of work with its own philosophy, tactics and ends. To the extent, even, that sections of The Politics of Postanarchism read as though Newman were proposing something of a postanarchist manifesto.Whilst perhaps best considered a companion piece to the more philosophically oriented From Bakunin to Lacan, Newman's latest book also functions as a kind of primer for those looking to engage with postanarchism for the first time. Several chapters of the book revisit predominant themes of his earlier work: there is the core postanarchist motif that anarchism needs 'rethinking', 'updating' and making 'more relevant'; a detailed account of the ontology and ethics underpinning postanarchism, this time rewritten with the aid of a notion of 'an-archy' derived in part from Emmanuel Levinas and Reiner Schurmann; and, the discussion of post-Marxism aside, a perhaps unnecessary digression charting the classical debate between anarchists and Marxists. What distinguishes this work from its predecessor, though, is that postanarchism is considered in light of, and against, competing perspectives within continental political thought, most notably the autonomism of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, and engages reflexively, but for tiie most part implicidy, with several of the criticisms levelled against the earlier book. It also brings the affinities between postanarchism and contemporary activist currents more sharply into relief and situates itself with respect to more recent anarchist theory, such as that proposed by Murray Bookchin and John Zerzan.To my mind, however, the most striking feature of the book lies in its revised attitude towards the post/classical anarchism dichotomy when compared with the earlier text. Now conceived in less antagonistic terms as a supplement to anarchism rather than its successor, postanarchism is reconfigured as a 'politics of anti-polities', as dwelling in the aporetic moment in anarchism between its political and anti-political dimensions. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,016
Communication savante0,0100,007
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,443
Écart entre enseignants0,355 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnarchist studiesMême sujetAnarchism and Radical PoliticsTravaux en français237 207