MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2214854966 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00191-6

Health and human rights in Canada: a global concern

2015· letter· en· W2214854966 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Chris Simms

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman rightsRefugeePolitical scienceLawGovernment (linguistics)ImmigrationLegislationCitizenshipHarmEconomic JusticePublic administrationPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A new report1UNCOHR Human Rights CommitteeConcluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Canada.http://nupge.ca/sites/nupge.ca/files/documents/ccpr_c_can_co_6_21189_e.pdfGoogle Scholar by the UN Committee on Human Rights (UNCOHR) is sharply critical of Canada's worsening human rights record. The first such assessment in 10 years (a period coinciding with a decade of conservative government), it describes policies that undermine human rights including the ability of civil society to lawfully protest such policies. Most issues cited relate to public health and safety and I illustrate some of them here ahead of Canada's federal election next week. The report is particularly concerned about the rights of out-groups (such as prisoners, people with mental illnesses, and refugees) and vulnerable populations. For instance, cuts to basic health services for refugees led Canadian doctors and lawyers to petition the federal courts to restore services; in doing so, the courts described government policy as “cruel and unusual”.2Federal CourtCanadian Doctors for Refugee Care, the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, Daniel Garcia Rodriques, Hanif Ayubi and Justice For Children and Youth vs Attorney General Of Canada and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration: judgment and reasons.https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1212674-t-356-13-cdn-doctors-v-agc-judgment-and-reasons.htmlGoogle Scholar Indeed, with a large parliamentary majority, it is often left to the courts to provide a check on government power. For example, the federal courts reversed attempts to close harm-reduction services for drug users and legislation that threatened the health and safety of prostitutes, and repeatedly stepped in to protect aboriginal land rights.3CBC NewsMandatory minimums ruling adds to Ottawa's losing streak.http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mandatory-minimums-ruling-adds-to-ottawa-s-legal-losing-streak-1.2696593Google Scholar The UNCOHR highlights violence against women, especially the 1189 murdered or missing aboriginal women and girls and the need for a national inquiry—an issue to which Prime Minister Harper responded on national television—“Um, it isn't really high on our radar, to be honest”.4CBC NewsFull text of Peter Manbridge's interview with Prime Minister Stephen Harper.http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/full-text-of-peter-mansbridge-s-interview-with-stephen-harper-1.2876934Google Scholar Over-representation of aboriginal people in prisons (who make up 44% of the adolescent females in custody) is also cited by the report, as is use of solitary confinement experienced by one in four inmates. Lack of health care services in First Nations communities is another issue mentioned in the report. When child-welfare activist Cindy Blackstock sued the government for failure to provide basic services to First Nations communities, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Canadian Security Intelligence Service placed her under surveillance (collecting a 400 page file on her) until the Federal Private Commissioner ordered them to “cease and desist” and destroy their files.5Canadian PressSnooping on activists went too far, privacy commissioner says.http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/snooping-on-first-nations-activist-went-too-far-privacy-commissioner-says-1.1364426Google Scholar The report is especially concerned about the passage of Bill 51 which gives government greater power to undertaken domestic surveillance on groups and individuals such a environmentalists, aboriginal people, or simply any that disagree with government policy—with little or no oversight. One member of the UN committee noted “This is not the Canada that I know”.6Farhar L Shining a light on Canada's deteriorating human rights.http://cips.uottawa.ca/shining-a-light-on-canadas-deteriorating-human-rights-record/Google Scholar As Canadians queue to vote in the federal election next week, some will be uncomfortable knowing that the new Fair Elections Act that requires an official photo identification will overwhelmingly discriminate against those who are least likely to produce it7Deveaux M Williams M Cameron M et al.Don't undermine Elections Canada.National Post. March 11, 2014; (accessed Oct 15, 2015).http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/dont-undermine-elections-canadaGoogle Scholar—the very groups cited by UNCOHR. Many Canadians perhaps already uncomfortable with Canada's tepid response to the Syrian refugee crisis will have been further dismayed to learn this past week that it was Harper's interference with the refugee claimant process that shut the doors; as they cast their ballot, some will recall a different era when Canada welcomed tens of thousands of refugees from Vietnam and Kosovo. But no Canadian will recall anything to compare with the recent descent into identity politics in which the Prime Minister referred to “old-stock” Canadians (as distinct from those born abroad) on national television—the stratification of society to which Michael Marmot so often refers. And because many do not recognise it as Canadian or the context in which it nests, they will reject it—some with anger, others with hope. I declare no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,150
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,985

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,009
Communication savante0,0160,005
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,380
Écart entre enseignants0,317 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207