248 SUPERSTIMULATION STRATEGIES FOR OVUM PICKUP IN HOLSTEIN DONORS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In vitro embryo production (IVP) is an important tool to enhance genetic gain in cattle. However, oocyte quality is a limiting factor for the success of IVP programs in high-producing donors. A series of studies using protocols for follicular wave synchronization and superstimulation before ovum pickup were performed to improve the efficiency of ovum pickup and in vitro production in dairy cattle. The first study evaluated superstimulation with FSH (Folltropin-V®) before ovum pickup in lactating (n = 15) and non-lactating (n = 15) Holstein donors in a crossover design. Cows underwent synchronization of follicle wave emergence (FWE) and at the expected time of FWE, the FSH group received a total dosage of 200 mg of FSH in 4 decreasing doses 12 h apart; controls received no FSH, and ovum pickup was conducted 72 h after the expected FWE in all cows. The FSH-treated cows had a higher (P < 0.01) percentage of medium-sized follicles (6 to 10 mm) at the time of ovum pickup (55.1%) than control cows (20.8%) as well as lower cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) recovery rates (60.0 v. 69.8%, respectively; P = 0.002). However, FSH-treated cows had a higher blastocyst production rate (34.5 v. 19.8%; P < 0.01) and more transferable embryos per ovum pickup session (3.0 ± 0.5 v. 1.8 ± 0.4; P = 0.02). Subsequent trials evaluated plasma FSH profiles in 23 heifers and in vitro production following ovum pickup in 90 non-lactating Holstein donors superstimulated with a single IM injection of FSH in 0.5% hyaluronan (HA; MAP-5®, 50 mg). Controls received no treatment, while the F200 group received 200 mg of FSH in 4 decreasing doses 12 h apart. The F200HA and F300HA groups received 200 or 300 mg of FSH in 5 or 7.5 mL, respectively, of 0.5% HA by a single IM injection. Circulating FSH area under curve (AUC) in FSH-treated animals was greater than in the control group (P = 0.02). Although the AUC for F200 group did not differ from HA groups (P = 0.56), the total period of time plasma FSH levels were elevated was greater than in the HA groups (P < 0.01). In the IVP trial, FSH-treated cows had a greater proportion of medium-sized (6–10 mm) follicles than controls (P < 0.001). Also, numbers of follicles (P = 0.01) retrieved (control: 13.1 ± 1.0; F200: 16.5 ± 1.2; F200HA: 19.5 ± 2.1; F300HA: 15.4 ± 1.4; P = 0.01) and blastocysts produced per ovum pickup session (control: 2.4 ± 0.5; F200: 3.7 ± 0.7; F200HA: 4.7 ± 0.7; F300HA: 3.1 ± 0.6; P = 0.06) were greater in cows receiving FSH, regardless of treatment. Cows in the F200HA group had a greater recovery rate (P = 0.009), number of COC cultured (P = 0.04), and blastocysts per ovum pickup session (P = 0.06) than cows in the F300HA group. In conclusion, superstimulation of Holstein donors before ovum pickup increased the efficiency of in vitro production. Additionally, a single IM dose of FSH in 0.5% HA resulted in similar plasma FSH profiles to twice-daily FSH treatment. Non-lactating donors treated with FSH produced more embryos per ovum pickup session regardless of FSH treatment. Lastly, all in vitro-produced endpoints were greater following a single dose of 200 mg of FSH in 0.5% HA than 300 mg of FSH in 0.5% HA.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».