MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2219694517 · doi:10.1210/en.2015-1985

Curiouser and Curiouser: The Evolving Story of the Mechanisms Involved in Puberty

2015· letter· en· W2219694517 sur OpenAlexaff
Neil J. MacLusky

Notice bibliographique

RevueEndocrinology · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEndocrinologyInternal medicineNeuroactive steroidBiologyNeurosecretionGonadotropin-releasing hormoneEndocrine systemPeriod (music)Delayed pubertyPrecocious pubertyKisspeptinHormoneReceptorMedicineLuteinizing hormone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sometimes, like a giant jigsaw puzzle, concepts in endocrinology take time to develop, to form a coherent picture of how endocrine systems are integrated to support physiological responses. Such, it can be argued, has been the case with respect to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying puberty. For more than 50 years, it has been known that mammals experience a period of agonadal restraint during development, in which reproductive function is held in check (1). As puberty approaches, this restraint is switched off and pulsatile GnRH secretion is activated. What caused the juvenile period to end remained a matter of conjecture, although a shift in steroid feedback was suggested by observations showing that immature rats had enhanced sensitivity to the negative feedback effects of estradiol (2), whereas the onset of ovarian cyclicity could be advanced by prepubertal injections of estradiol (3). In the past 5 decades, several other important pieces of the puzzle have been filled in. The brain was itself found to be a site of gonadal steroid synthesis (4, 5). Data emerged to indicate that neurosteroid synthesis might contribute to reproductive function (6). Dramatic advances were made in understanding the neurotransmitter and neuropeptide circuitry responsible for regulating the onset of reproductive function, in particular the kisspeptin system (7, 8). However, what actually triggered the change in feedback control of gonadotrophin secretion at puberty remained obscure. A shift from a predominantly inhibitory hypothalamic environment to one in which excitatory neurotransmitters activated the GnRH neurons was believed to occur (9, 10), but what caused this shift remained unknown. In the current issue of Endocrinology, Kenealy et al (11) develop the novel idea that in female primates, the control of GnRH secretion before and during puberty may actually operate in a relatively similar hypothalamic steroidal milieu: only the source of the estradiol is different. To determine hypothalamic steroid concentrations, perfusates were collected in vivo from the stalk-median eminence (S-ME) region of 32 female rhesus monkeys at different stages of prepubertal and pubertal development. The samples were assayed for estradiol, estrone, testosterone, androstenedione, and progesterone, using a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based method. Concomitantly, GnRH in the perfusates, as well as LH and steroid levels in circulating serum samples from the same animals, were also assayed. As expected, GnRH and LH levels followed a similar developmental pattern, levels at midpuberty being higher than either prepuberty or early puberty. Circulating estradiol levels also were higher in midpuberty. The steroid measurements in the S-ME perfusates, however, exhibited a strikingly different pattern. Although androstenedione, testosterone, and progesterone did not change significantly in the perfusates across the different stages of puberty, estrone and estradiol were found to be high in the S-ME perfusates from prepubertal animals, declining in midpuberty and early puberty, respectively. Because serum estradiol levels increased over the same period, the S-ME to serum ratio fell dramatically in the midpubertal animals, more than 5-fold in the case of estradiol and more than 60-fold in the case of estrone. These results suggest that although the prepubertal period is indeed characterized by a period of GnRH inhibition that does not depend on ovarian hormone secretion, it is not in fact steroid independent. Rather, it may be mediated at least in part by estradiol produced in situ, within the hypothalamus itself. As the animals approach puberty, the intrahypothalamic secretion of estradiol is down-regulated, allowing GnRH to rise, which in turn results in ovarian activation. As circulating estradiol concentrations increase, the system switches over to primarily ovarian control and normal cyclicity commences. Although this is an attractive hypothesis to explain why the reproductive system remains quiescent during the prepubertal period, it still leaves a number of questions unanswered. Hypothalamic levels of estradiol may well decline between pre- and early puberty, but they rebound shortly thereafter (11). Yet in midpuberty the responses of the brain and pituitary are fundamentally altered so that reproductive function does not immediately return to the prepubertal state, despite rising circulating estradiol levels. Something has changed in the mechanisms mediating estrogenic control of GnRH neuronal activity. Is it possible that circulating, as opposed to locally synthesized, estradiol affects different groups of target cells in the hypothalamus? What causes neuroestradiol production to decline as puberty is initiated? What in the hypothalamic circuitry is different after puberty, and what initiates this shift in responsiveness? A picture may be emerging, but plenty of pieces of the puzzle still remain to be found. Disclosure Summary: The author has nothing to disclose. stalk-median eminence.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,010
Communication savante0,0040,012
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,016
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEndocrinologyMême sujetHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesTravaux en français237 207