MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2219889973

천주교회의 대한민국 정부 수립에 대한 인식과 기여

2009· article· ko· W2219889973 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
여진천

Notice bibliographique

Revue교회사연구 · 2009
Typearticle
Langueko
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommunismDemocracyPolitical sciencePoliticsGovernment (linguistics)PersecutionLawPublic administrationEconomic historyHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

After the long desired liberation in 1945, Catholic leaders in Korea realized in the light of papal documents that they had to oppose communism and not to collaborate with the Communists. So they aroused anti-communism wide-rangingly, hearing that Catholics in North Korea and Yenchi had been suffering severe persecution. Therefore they strongly desired a liberal democratic government to be established in Korea. Korean Catholic leaders newly illuminated the Catholic Action when the United States Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) began to administrate. In accord with Pope Pius ?'s emphasis on??the era of act”, they affirmatively kept company and collaboration with political leaders and participated in the political party activities. So some Catholics kept in close link with the USAMGIK and welcomed the rightist groups such as Lee Seung Man. They also joined the Korea Democratic Party. In the Press & Publications Department of the Church Kyeong Hyang Magazine, The Catholic Times were reissued and Kyeong Hyang Sinmun was launched. The Church in Korea played active role in the anti-trusteeship movement arisen from late December, 1945. When the collaboration movement between moderate rightists and leftists with the assistance of the USAMGIK began, Church media also supported that. Finally the Korean problem was moved to the United Nations(U.N.) and the U.N. approved a resolution calling for general elections in Korea. The Church in Korea was in support of the resolution and took the leading role in building a democratic nation. And it also launched countermeasure committee on national affairs and made action guide for the first general elections on May 10, 1948. It was because the Church recognized the general elections as a national goal to establish an independent democratic nation. Out of the men elected to the National Assembly at that time Chang Myun was the only Catholic. After the first Korean government was inaugurated in August 1948, the government made every diplomatic effort to get international recognition as the only legitimate government on the Korean Peninsula. Before that, the Church and national political leaders in Korea had recognized the arrival of Msgr. Byrne, the Apostolic Delegate, as an approval of the independence of Korea by the Holy See. Also Msgr. Byrne actively fulfilled his obligations as the Apostolic Delegate to Korea. He sent letters in person to the Apostolic Delegate to Canada and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada who probably would not be in favor at the U.N. General Assembly. In those letters he called upon them to support the Korean government. Fr. Pierre Singer in France gladly accommodated Chang Myun in various ways, and thus Chang Myun played a conspicuous role in getting an approval for the korean government at the U.N.. After the approval, Church leaders gave great thanks to the Lord and prayed that the Blessed Mother might help to unify the divided nation and let communists repentant. Like this, Catholic Church leaders, especially Bishop Paul Ro Ki-nam and Chang Myun, actively participated in the process of the establishment of the Korean government. The efforts of the Church for democratization in Korea were also continued under military dictatorship from 1970s to 1980s. So many Church leaders such as Stephen Cardinal Kim Sou-hwan devoted themselves to building democratic society in Korea at that time. It seems to be necessary in future to reconsider the role of the Church in Korea in today's development of liberal democracy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,056
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,187

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0560,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue교회사연구Même sujetKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesTravaux en français237 207