MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2220265832

"Purely Personal and Philosophical": Gov. Winthrop Rockefeller's Death Sentence Commutations

2015· article· en· W2220265832 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Ringer

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Arkansas Historical Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Systems and Judicial Processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLawPower (physics)PrisonFederalistEconomic JusticeLife imprisonmentState (computer science)Punishment (psychology)GovernorBarbarismRepentancePolitical scienceImprisonmentPsychologyPhilosophyCivilizationTheologySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On December 29, 1970, Arkansas governor Winthrop Rockefeller issued an announcement:My position on capital punishment has been clear since long before I became governor. I am unalterably opposed to it and will remain so as long as I live. What earthly mortal has the omnipotence to say who among us shall live and who shall die? I do not. Moreover, in that the law grants me authority to set aside the death penalty, I cannot and will not turn my back on lifelong Christian teachings and beliefs, merely to let history run out its course on a fallible and failing theory of punitive justice.By authority vested in me as the 37th elected Governor of Arkansas I am today commuting to life imprisonment the death sentences of the fifteen prisoners now on death row at Tucker Prison Farm.The records, individually and collectively, of the fifteen condemned prisoners bear no relevance to my decision. It is purely personal and philosophical. I yearn to see other chief executives throughout the nation follow suit, so that as a people we may hasten the elimination of barbarism as a tool of American justice.The records of the men on death row, along with the findings and recommendations of an outstanding committee I have empanelled, will now be presented to members of the State Parole Board for their own consideration. I am aware that there will be reaction to my decision. However, failing to take this action while it is within my power, I could not live with myself.1As he anticipated, the lame-duck governor's decision to commute the sentences of everyone on death row in Arkansas (eleven black men and four white men) provoked a wide range of reactions, including 397 letters and telegrams sent to his office and now held with Rockefeller's personal papers at the Arkansas Studies Institute in Little Rock. Of the 397 responses, 324 supported Rockefeller and congratulated him for his courageous action. Arkansas residents accounted for slightly less than one-third of the congratulatory messages (ninety-two). remainder came from other states or even other countries, including Kenya, England, Germany, France, and Canada. In contrast to the large number of positive messages, only seventy-three letters and telegrams contained unfavorable opinions. Among those, Arkansas residents again accounted for only around onethird (twenty-six) of the responses. Aside from the personal letters, editorials and letters to the editor in local newspapers also voiced strong opinions. state's two major dailies, the Arkansas Democrat and the Arkansas Gazette, both based in Little Rock, not only commented on the commutations but also reprinted editorials from smaller Arkansas newspapers, providing a spectrum of opinion from across the state. This commentary both supported and condemned the governor's action.Rockefeller would subsequently justify his action by citing public opinion. He firmly believed that he had been well within his constitutional authority to commute the sentences and noted the overwhelming support expressed in the letters he received. The actions of the legislative and executive branches, he asserted, and should more readily reflect the public sentiment. Rockefeller went on to suggest the need for executive action on capital punishment even before the law had changed: The legislative process takes time to catch up with the public sentiment.... [T]he fate of these people can be altered by the use of a device that has been virtually ignored as a means of abolishing the death penalty-executive clemency.2Yet the response to Rockefeller's commutations reflected public opinion in a more complicated way, providing an intriguing snapshot of attitudes toward the death penalty during a period of transition. His actions came at the tail end of a period in which majority sentiment had opposed capital punishment. Public opinion polls showed support had declined to below 50 percent in the early part of the 1960s. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,755
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,979

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Arkansas Historical QuarterlyMême sujetLegal Systems and Judicial ProcessesTravaux en français237 207