Notice bibliographique
Résumé
J. Roger Bray, through post-Ph.D. collaboration with his former doctoral adviser at Wisconsin, John Curtis, was the lead author of one of the most significant postwar papers in the field of ecology (Bray and Curtis 1957, see Beals 1984). It presented a way of seeing the vegetation of a region quantitatively and three-dimensionally. The paper took a major step toward ending the view held by some scientists that vegetation is a collection of distinct associations, and instead advanced the principle of continuous variation, a view that over the next 20 years came to be accepted around the world. Roger Bray was born in Belleville, Illinois, in 1929 and grew up in Urbana. His father was a soil chemist widely known for having established the Bray Test for available soil phosphorus. Roger was active in a Congregational Church youth group whose pastor was a pacifist, creating a significant antiwar environment. He also showed an early love of learning and a determined scientific curiosity, and finished his undergraduate work in 1950, with honors in Botany, after three years at the University of Illinois. In August 1950, Roger was accepted as a graduate teaching assistant under John Curtis at the University of Wisconsin (Madison) and began field work on Wisconsin savanna composition and the mutual occurrence of plant species (Bray 1956). In 1951 Roger received the Botany Department Fellowship and wrote a dissertation in two parts: the phytosociology of Wisconsin's savanna (Bray 1960), and the influence of the concepts of order and complexity as alternatives to the prevailing ecologic mechanism (Bray 1958). In autumn 1955, Roger went to the University of Minnesota, where he taught ecology and worked with Don Lawrence on a study funded by a substantial long-term Hill Foundation grant. That work resulted over the following years in reports on plant productivity and energy balances (Bray et al, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1966). After two years at Minnesota, Roger became an Assistant Professor at the University of Toronto, which continued from 1957 to 1962. During this time he extended his summer research at Minnesota, started a forest litter study that grew into a worldwide synthesis of litter production (Bray and Gorham 1964), and published his first climatology paper on a statistical examination of the change in atmospheric CO2 from 1873 to 1955 (Bray 1959). At Toronto, Roger, together with Dr. Michael McNamee, a nuclear physicist who had worked in London with Bertrand Russell on nuclear disarmament, founded the Canadian Committee of 100. Along with the Toronto Faculty Committee for Nuclear Disarmament, the group put pressure on the Canadian government to oppose all nuclear bomb testing. During these years Gwendolyn J. Struik, born in 1932, graduated from Antioch College and came to study under John Curtis. She and Roger married in 1961, after she finished her Ph.D. in 1960 and was teaching at Wheaton College, Massachusetts. Roger recognized her sharp mind for ecology, as well as the influence of her father, a famous Dutch mathematician and Marx scholar at MIT. Gwen's research was on the integration of understory components in Wisconsin forests, the next phase of the Curtis plan for plant ecology in Wisconsin (Struik 1965). In 1962 Roger resigned at Toronto, protesting Canada's allowing U.S. nuclear weapons in Frobisher Bay in the Canadian Arctic. In late 1962 Roger and Gwen moved to Kelowna, British Columbia, with a study grant from the AAAS. They were there less than a year when the “Cuban nuclear crisis” occurred and they moved to New Zealand with jobs at the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR), Palmerston North. Gwen worked on the autecology of flatweeds in various grasslands, and Roger worked full-time on climatology, beginning with a study of Caesium-137 in New Zealand milk (Bray and Jackman 1968). After fulfilling their travel bond, Roger and Gwen moved to Nelson, where Roger published 23 papers on solar climate relationships and the effects of volcanism on climate, of which 14 appeared in Nature or Science. He also completed a review of vegetation distribution, tree growth, and crop success relative to recent climate change (Bray 1971). In Nelson, Gwen ran for parliament for the NZ Values Party (now the Green Party) in 1975 and 1976, and they both worked for a nuclear-free NZ, which was enacted into law in 1987. They also helped found the first NZ coastal conservation group in 1973, which is still active in 2010. Gwen later published on NZ fisheries (Struik 1983). In 1970, Roger and Gwen bought a property adjacent to a coastal forest and have since produced much of their food, raised three daughters, sampled their mature and regenerating forests, trapped more than 1000 brush-tailed Australian possum pests, and for nearly 40 years have set the same fish net in the same location in a nearby estuary (Bray and Struik 2006). A summary of Roger's contributions to plant ecology (through some 70 papers) is in McCune and Beal's 1993 paper on the ”History of the development of the Bray-Curtis Ordination.” Despite leaving the upper Midwest, the site of his most famous scientific contribution, the number of his high-citation papers among Curtis and students is tied for second (with Loucks) after only Curtis himself (Mladenoff and Burgess 1993:188, Table 4). Bray's impact will be long remembered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,035 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».