Special section: Selected papers from the Third European Workshop on Monte Carlo Treatment Planning (MCTP2012)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Third European Workshop on Monte Carlo Treatment Planning (MCTP2012) was held from 15–18 May, 2012 in Seville, Spain. The event was organized by the Universidad de Sevilla with the support of the European Workgroup on Monte Carlo Treatment Planning (EWG-MCTP). MCTP2012 followed two successful meetings, one held in Ghent (Belgium) in 2006 (Reynaert 2007) and one in Cardiff (UK) in 2009 (Spezi 2010). The recurrence of these workshops together with successful events held in parallel by McGill University in Montreal (Seuntjens et al 2012), show consolidated interest from the scientific community in Monte Carlo (MC) treatment planning. The workshop was attended by a total of 90 participants, mainly coming from a medical physics background. A total of 48 oral presentations and 15 posters were delivered in specific scientific sessions including dosimetry, code development, imaging, modelling of photon and electron radiation transport, external beam radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, brachitherapy and hadrontherapy. A copy of the programme is available on the workshop's website ( www.mctp2012.com ). In this special section of Physics in Medicine and Biology we report six papers that were selected following the journal's rigorous peer review procedure. These papers actually provide a good cross section of the areas of application of MC in treatment planning that were discussed at MCTP2012. Czarnecki and Zink (2013) and Wagner et al (2013) present the results of their work in small field dosimetry. Czarnecki and Zink (2013) studied field size and detector dependent correction factors for diodes and ion chambers within a clinical 6MV photon beam generated by a Siemens linear accelerator. Their modelling work based on the BEAMnrc/EGSnrc codes and experimental measurements revealed that unshielded diodes were the best choice for small field dosimetry because of their independence from the electron beam spot size and correction factor close to unity. Wagner et al (2013) investigated the recombination effect on liquid ionization chambers for stereotactic radiotherapy, a field of increasing importance in external beam radiotherapy. They modelled both radiation source (Cyberknife unit) and detector with the BEAMnrc/EGSnrc codes and quantified the dependence of the response of this type of detectors on factors such as the volume effect and the electrode. They also recommended that these dependences be accounted for in measurements involving small fields. In the field of external beam radiotherapy, Chakarova et al (2013) showed how total body irradiation (TBI) could be improved by simulating patient treatments with MC. In particular, BEAMnrc/EGSnrc based simulations highlighted the importance of optimizing individual compensators for TBI treatments. In the same area of application, Mairani et al (2013) reported on a new tool for treatment planning in proton therapy based on the FLUKA MC code. The software, used to model both proton therapy beam and patient anatomy, supports single-field and multiple-field optimization and can be used to optimize physical and relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose distribution, using both constant and variable RBE models. In the field of nuclear medicine Marcatili et al (2013) presented RAYDOSE, a Geant4-based code specifically developed for applications in molecular radiotherapy (MRT). RAYDOSE has been designed to work in MRT trials using sequential positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging to model patient specific time-dependent metabolic uptake and to calculate the total 3D dose distribution. The code was validated through experimental measurements in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. Finally, in the field of code development Miras et al (2013) reported on CloudMC, a Windows Azure-based application for the parallelization of MC calculations in a dynamic cluster environment. Although the performance of CloudMC has been tested with the PENELOPE MC code, the authors report that software has been designed in a way that it should be independent of the type of MC code, provided that simulation meets a number of operational criteria. We wish to thank Elekta/CMS Inc., the University of Seville, the Junta of Andalusia and the European Regional Development Fund for their financial support. We would like also to acknowledge the members of EWG-MCTP for their help in peer-reviewing all the abstracts, and all the invited speakers who kindly agreed to deliver keynote presentations in their area of expertise. A final word of thanks to our colleagues who worked on the reviewing process of the papers selected for this special section and to the IOP Publishing staff who made it possible. MCTP2012 was accredited by the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics as a CPD event for medical physicists. Emiliano Spezi and Antonio Leal Guest Editors References Chakarova R, Müntzing K, Krantz M, E Hedin E and Hertzman S 2013 Monte Carlo optimization of total body irradiation in a phantom and patient geometry Phys. Med. Biol. 58 2461–69 Czarnecki D and Zink K 2013 Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for diodes and ion chambers in small photon fields Phys. Med. Biol. 58 2431–44 Mairani A, Böhlen T T, Schiavi A, Tessonnier T, Molinelli S, Brons S, Battistoni G, Parodi K and Patera V 2013 A Monte Carlo-based treatment planning tool for proton therapy Phys. Med. Biol. 58 2471–90 Marcatili S, Pettinato C, Daniels S, Lewis G, Edwards P, Fanti S and Spezi E 2013 Development and validation of RAYDOSE: a Geant4 based application for molecular radiotherapy Phys. Med. Biol. 58 2491–508 Miras H, Jiménez R, Miras C and Gomà C 2013 CloudMC: A cloud computing application for Monte Carlo simulation Phys. Med. Biol. 58 N125–33 Reynaert N 2007 First European Workshop on Monte Carlo Treatment Planning J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 74 011001 Seuntjens J, Beaulieu L, El Naqa I and Després P 2012 Special section: Selected papers from the Fourth International Workshop on Recent Advances in Monte Carlo Techniques for Radiation Therapy Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (11) E01 Spezi E 2010 Special section: Selected papers from the Second European Workshop on Monte Carlo Treatment Planning (MCTP2009) Phys. Med. Biol. 55 (16) E01 Wagner A, Crop F, Lacornerie T, Vandevelde F and Reynaert N 2013 Use of a liquid ionization chamber for stereotactic radiotherapy dosimetry Phys. Med. Biol. 58 2445–59
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,023 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».