About Some Characteristics of Black English/à PROPOS DE CERTAINES CARACTÉRISTIQUES DE L'ANGLAIS DES NOIRS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract: Back English is one of the varieties of so called Standard English spoken by the Black Americans. It has its own characteristics and uniqueness. We study it only because we want to know it better in order to understand and communicate with each other better. Key words: black English; characteristics; variety; grammar Resume: L'anglaise des Noirs est l'une des varietes de ce qu'on appelle l'anglais standard parle par les Noirs americains. Elle a ses propres caracteristiques et ses particularites. Nous l'etudions dans cet article parce que nous voulons mieux le connaitre afin de se comprendre et de se communiquer mieux. Mots-Cles: l'anglais des noirs; characteristiques; variete, grammaire As we all know that each language exists in a number of different varieties, and individuals vary in their language they use according to occasions. Not every individual will necessarily command the same range of varieties every other person, but throughout the total linguistic community there will be a considerable features. The Black English , especially its spoken form is a special kind of variety. Linguistics are agreed that no variety of a language is inherently better than any other. They insist that all language and all varieties of particular language are equal in that they quite adequately serve the needs of who use them. So some linguistics who have described the speech by black residents of the northern United States have noticed how uniform that speech is in many aspects. Then, what are the characteristics of black English? 1. SOME CHARACTERISTICS IN PRONUNCIATION Look at the following talk between two ten year's old boys and an adult. Tom: hey Ms. Smith, d'ya watch Kung Fu on TV wif dat dude. . . wha's his name? David: he have my name,Tom. Dat's duh dude's name. Ms Smith: yes I've watched it a few times. It's really an exciting show. David: did you awah see how he throw all dose dudes around, an how he use his legs? Tom: yeah. You know what? He can always fight. He don't fight to be mean dough. He fight to be good, and he'p people. An' he always duh good guy. David:you know what? He one of does pries' or somefin. Hey Ms. Smith, what is he? I can't remebah what dey call... On the phonological level, several characteristics of Black English are evident in this conversation. 1st. The use of duh, dat, dose, dey. Tom and David repeatedly use a d sound for the th in standard English at the beginning of the words, such the, that, those, there, and they. And the use of v for th is also heared between vowels of words, such as owah by Tom. 2nd. The dropping of r after vowels, such yo (you or you'er) ,sho(sure), for(four), po (pour),mo(more), noth (north.)... but at the end of words, where it is especially noticeable in Tom and David's conversation, it is indicated by the spelling - ah, in owah, remembah 3rd. . Black English has certain has certain phonological, and syntactic characteristics. Words like thing and this may be pronounced ting and dis. bath may sound like baff ; brother like bruwer , nothing like nuffin. Still other examples are bik for big; kit for kid, and cup for cub. The result of such losses is that there are likely to be quite different homophones in Black English and in standard varieties of the language. Vowels may be nasalized and nasal consonants lost: run and end may just be in the first case an r followed by a nasalized vowel and in the second case a simple nasalized vowel with no pronunciation at all of the final nd. The diphthongs in words like find and found may be both monophongized and nasalized, and the words may lack any pronunciation of the final nd. Consequently, find ,found, even fond may become homophonous, all pronounced with an f and a following nasalized vowel. Furthermore, in morphology, because final t and d are often pronounced, there may be no overt signaling of past tense, so that I walked sounds just like I walk. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».