MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2224913946 · doi:10.1177/1329878x0913300142

Book reviews including 'Remaking the movies: digital content and the evolution of the film and video industries', by Graham Vickery and Richard Hawkins

2009· other· en· W2224913946 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marion McCutcheon

Notice bibliographique

RevueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) · 2009
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAsian Culture and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDigital videoArt historyContent (measure theory)ArtMedia studiesSociologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chris Lawe Davies reviews the book 'The SBS story: the challenge of cultural diversity', by Ien Ang, Gay Hawkins and Lamia Dabboussy, published by UNSW Press, Sydney, 2008; Peter C. Pugsley reivews the book 'Still moving: between cinema and photography', edited by Karen Beckman and Jean Ma, published by Duke University Press, Durham, NC, United States, 2008; Mark Hayes reviews the book 'Digital media and democracy: tactics in hard times', edited by Megan Boler, published by MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, United States, 2008; Marion McCutcheon reviews the book 'YouTube: online video and participatory culture', by Jean Burgess and Joshua Green, published by Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009; Lisa Grunders reviews the book 'The handbook of children, media and development', edited by Sandra L. Calvert and Barbara J. Wilson, published by Blackwell, Chichester, 2008; Nicola Goc reviews the book 'Transnational media events: the Mohammed cartoons and the imagined clash of civilizations', by Elisabeth Eide, Risto Kunelius and Angela Phillips, published by Nordicom, Goteborg, 2008; Sam Carroll reviews the book 'Pop idols and pirates: mechanisms of consumption and the global circulation of popular music', by Charles Fairchild, published by Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008; Kevin Howley reviews the book 'Notions of community: a collection of community media debates and dilemmas', published by Peter Lang, Oxford, 2009; Craig Hight reviews the book 'Satire TV: politics and comedy in the post-network era', edited by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones, and Ethan Thompson, published by New York University Press, New York, 2009; Nick Herd reviews the book 'Digitize this book! the politics of new media or why we need open access now', by Gary Hall, published by the University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2009; Henk Huijser reviews the book 'Small tech: the culture of digital tools', edited by Byron Hawk, David M. Rieder and Ollie Oviedo, published by the University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2008; Rimi Khan reviews the book 'Beyond Barbie & Mortal Kombat: new perspectives on gender and gaming', edited by Yasmin B. Kafai, Carrie Heeter, Jill Denner and Jennifer Y. Sun, published by MIT Press, Cambridge, United States, 2008; Jonathan Marshall reviews the book 'The trouble with theory: the educational costs of postmodernism', by Gavin Kitching, published by Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2008; Craig Hight reviews the book 'New media: a critical introduction', by Martin Lister, Jon Dovey, Seth Giddings, Iain Grant and Kieran Kelly, published by Routledge, New York, 2009; Jane Felstead reviews the book 'The porn report', by Alan McKee, Katherine Albury and Catharine Lumby, published by Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 2008; Louise North reviews the book 'Interpreting news', by Graham Meikle, published by Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2009; C. K. Wilson reviews the book 'Loving & hating Hollywood: reframing global and local cinemas', by Jane Mills, published by Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2009; Catherine Middleton reviews the book 'For sale to the highest bidder: Telecom policy in Canada', by Marita Moll and Leslie Regan Shade, published by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa, 2008; Darren Jorgensen reviews the book 'Displaced allegories: post-revolutionary Iranian cinema', by Negar Mottahedeh, published by Duke University Press, Durham, NC, United States, 2008; Michael Walsh reviews the book 'Experimental music: audio explorations in Australia', by Gail Priest, published by UNSW Press, Sydney, 2009; Candice Jansz reviews the book 'Techno-politics and some structural challenges facing the internet: a critical comment', by Terje Rasmussen, published by VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Saarbrucken, 2007; C. K. Wilson reviews the book 'Mediated crossroads: identity, youth culture and ethnicity: theoretical and methodological challenges', edited by Ingererd Rydin and Ulrika Sjoberg, published by Nordicom, Goteborg, 2008; Donald Reid reviews the book 'Manufacturing Europe: spaces of democracy, diversity and communication', edited by Inka Salovaara-Moring, Nordicom, Goteborg, 2009; Marion McCutcheon reviews the book 'Remaking the movies: digital content and the evolution of the film and video industries', by Graham Vickery and Richard Hawkins, published by OECD Publications, Paris, 2008; Jock Given reviews the book 'Cultural products and the World Trade Organization', by T. Voon, published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007; Josephine May reviews the book 'Australian postwar documentary film: an arc of mirrors', by Deane Williams, published by Intellect, Bristol, 2008; You Jie reviews the book 'Media and cultural transformation in China', by Yu Haiqing, published by Routledge, London, 2009; Kay Hearn reviews the book 'TV drama in China', edited by Ying Zhu, Michael Keane and Ruoyun Bai, published by Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, 2008.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,283
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,011
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)Même sujetAsian Culture and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207